I hope you understand a little more why it irked me. But in the end it does not matter, it is just something that stood out in the documentary, giving an indication (to me) this was a more a Prequel story: in tone, style, execution, and also overall underwhelming quality: than an actual bridge, or genuine half way point story between the two trilogies.
I do, thank you for clearing that up. It’s refreshing to have actual conversations about these things, rather than it dissolving into just aggressive name calling etc. as seems to be the norm on some platforms.
I understand where you’re coming from. Though with the exception of some of the characters (i.e. Obi Wan and Bail Organa) I thought it bridged the setting quite well. There were “prequelly tones/settings” but the inclusion of Storm Troopers pulled it a litte bit into the OT territory. But again, that is just my viewing of it.
I agree, and it is why I like this platform more than many others: there is more respect and actual conversation on here, even from people different outlooks and opinions. Thankfully there is not too much “agenda spreading” on here like on many other websites, reddits and YouTubes. And thank you for explaining your view as well.
About Bond: My preferred Bnnd is Connery, followed by Brosnan (more the early films than later), and I wish Dalton had been given more films to do, to see where he would have taken the character. But they are all good, even Lazenby, in an underrated film too. Bu that may be better suited for another thread. lol