film isn't perfect, and tampering with it isn't going to make it that way.
That's sort of silly. The idea that art isn't malleable seems to be a recent occurrence, and I don't understand it. Can anyone pinpoint the widespread acceptance of the idea that you can't EVER go back to a work of art after you're done with it? It seemed to happen sometime in the 90's. And this shit puppet seems to be the PERFECT justification for the idea of going back, as NOBODY liked it. What he's replacing it with at least has mostly positive word. Seems to make sense to me.
And expressing the idea that tampering with film isn't EVER going to help seems ironic on a board that's now more known for it's fan-edits than it's preservation ideal.
