logo Sign In

Post #151873

Author
Han Solo VS Indiana Jones
Parent topic
If George had only changed Special effects for the SE and DVD, would people have complained as much?
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/151873/action/topic#151873
Date created
1-Nov-2005, 1:57 PM
Originally posted by: ADigitalMan
I think it said a lot about Spielberg's character when, at the last possible minute, he released the 1982 version of E.T. along with the 2002 edition. Granted, the E.T. SE was much more maligned than the SW SE (and for good reasons). But the plan all along was to release the 2002 edition affordably, and release the 1982 edition in a much more expensive set. As the packaging was being prepped, the negative press gave Spielberg and Universal the balls to say "Okay, everybody gets both versions."

Meanwhile, Lucas still gives us the middle finger by this obnoxious party line of "The O-OT doesn't exist." Bollocks! Star Wars was a trendsetter and should have been so for DVD as well, giving us all a choice of which changes to watch on a single disc. Any, all or none. Instead we got flipped off by one of the worst transfers in memory AND a press that sucked up to Lucas rather than calling him on the carpet for all the technical misdeeds of the official DVD.


How could the special edition of ET be more maligned than the special edition of Star Wars?