Originally posted by: Regicidal_Maniac
You got a problem with parties bub?

I prefer Clinton's philosophy to Bush's "Make love not war" or more accurately "Don't blow everyone away just get (edited)".

Now there's a philosophy I'm sure we can all subscribe to.

I have no problem with parties if they are tasteful and don't interfere with a presidents duties. Clinton was in the oval office committing adultery when he should have been leading the nation. How many times did he let Bin Laden slip through his own fingers? What about ordering missiles to be shot at an EMPTY terrorist training facility after the embassy attacks?

If Clinton hadn't spend eight years cutting our military, using the armed forces as homosexual experiments*, and diverting its funding to worthless and redundant social programs, we might even be doing better in Iraq right now. Heck. If there was no 9-11 attack, then we probably wouldn't be in Iraq.

*Yeah I know, don't ask-don't tell. Whatever. I have nothing against letting gays be in the military as long as they aren't used to promote feminity among men. If they are there out of a desire to serve the country, then all the power to them.