He’s not for everyone but he’s only viewing things through a visual literacy lenses and of understanding why and even how George made the decisions he did versus what George was thinking as many do. Context is key. He cites Pauline Kael where neccessary. He has a well rounded view of things but naturally strives to portray the artist as he is one too. He writes and illustrates comics. He’s not the typical YouTube reviewer in that regard. He’s merely giving an artist’s prospective and I think that holds merit even if he can come across as all knowing sometimes.