Yeah, that's not CGI. That's a separate angle from an alternate take. It was manipulated with CG, yes, but the frame you're holding up as a CG model is, in fact, a picture of Harrison Ford.

By the way, this totally precludes you from ever criticizing CGI again, since you mistook a living human being for a "very very very very fake" Computer Generated Image.

See, this is why I don't take too much CGI criticism too seriously--the people criticizing have a hard time actually discerning between models, computer images, and even actual humans. Which, I think, speaks more to the SUCCESS of the tool than the failure of it.