logo Sign In

Post #43781

Author
Jedi Master DJR
Parent topic
Changes in 2004 DVDs
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/43781/action/topic#43781
Date created
17-Apr-2004, 8:42 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: jimbo
Jedi Master DJR I do very much like the fact that you choose to argue your point in an intelligent manner. Unlike some assholes on this site who choose to nag and bitch. DVDs resolution is only about 1.3x as high as laserdisc so a bootleg won't be that bad. Still there is a difference in Terminator 2 special Edition. That was done with seemless branching. This process could not be done on Star Wars without a huge loose in picture quailty to the point where it would look about as good as the bootlegs. They would have to be on separate discs. E.T is a better example. Thanks again for argueing your point intellegently though.



I wasn't arguing the technical specs with you, both my examples were of more traditional director's cuts, that is true. But you bringing up ET is a good point. Very close to release Speilberg said only the ET SE, but at the last minute included the OT. Do you think there was a significant benefit in releasing both versions? Since the picture and audio quality would go down with branching, like with the Beauty and the Beast DVD movie disc, would there be much harm in making the boxset where the cases for each of the movies held two discs(like the prequal cases) and then of course have a fourth case for the majority of the special features?