logo Sign In

INTERVIEW WITH GEORGE LUCAS (on Fox News)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I read this article dated 09-19-2004. A reviewer on Amazon.com posted this web address so you can read What George Lucas has to say about the DVD set, and about we the fans. Here is the address:

www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,132871,00.htmil

Stay informed, and keep the faith.

 

Mod Edit: a working link to the above article can be found here:-

‘Lucas on ‘Star Wars,’ Filmmaking and His New DVD’ - 19th September, 2004…

https://web.archive.org/web/20070523094518/https://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,132871,00.html

 

SAN RAFAEL, Calif. — George Lucas never figured on a 30-year career as a space pilot. Once “Star Wars” (search) shot into hyperspace, though, he found it hard to come back down to Earth.

Making its DVD debut this week, Lucas’ original sci-fi trilogy – “Star Wars,” “The Empire Strikes Back” and “Return of the Jedi” – began as an experimental foray into old-time studio moviemaking for Lucas, whose first two films had been far removed from usual Hollywood sensibilities.

Lucas’ sci-fi satire “THX 1138” had been a commercial dud, but the energetic “American Graffiti” with its driving soundtrack and multi-character point of view scored with audiences, giving the director clout to try something bigger that had been on his mind.

“I’d already started this other idea, which was to do a kind of a classic action adventure film using sets,” Lucas said over lunch at his 2,600-acre Skywalker Ranch (search). "I’d never worked on a set, I’d never worked at a studio. Never made a traditional movie. So I said, 'I’m going to do this once, just to see what it’s like, what it’s like to actually design everything, work on a soundstage, do an old-fashioned 1930s movie.

“And I’ll do it in that mode from the 1930s Saturday matinee serials, using kind of 1930s and '40s sensibilities, and I’ll base it on sort of mythological motifs and icons. I’ll just put it together in a modern form, and I’ll have fun. That’s how I got into that. I did it because it was an interesting move into an area that I thought I’d never go into.”

Three decades later, Lucas is preparing to launch the last of his six “Star Wars” films. Next summer brings “Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith,” (search) completing the prequel trilogy that tells the story of young Anakin Skywalker’s metamorphosis into the villainous Darth Vader of the original three films.

Fans have eagerly awaited the first three “Star Wars” films on DVD, a release Lucas initially intended to delay until he finished “Episode III.”

Some will be miffed that the original theatrical versions are not included in the “Star Wars” boxed set, which features only the special-edition versions Lucas issued in the late 1990s, with added effects and footage, including a scene between Harrison Ford’s Han Solo and crime lord Jabba the Hutt in the first “Star Wars.”
 

AP: Why did you change your mind and decide to put the original three movies out on DVD now?

Lucas: Just because the market has shifted so dramatically. A lot of people are getting very worried about piracy. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. It really just came down to, there may not be a market when I wanted to bring it out, which was like, three years from now. So rather than just sit by and watch the whole thing fall apart, better to bring it out early and get it over with.
 

AP: Why did you rework the original trilogy into the special-edition versions in the late 1990s?

Lucas: To me, the special edition ones are the films I wanted to make. Anybody that makes films knows the film is never finished. It’s abandoned or it’s ripped out of your hands, and it’s thrown into the marketplace, never finished. It’s a very rare experience where you find a filmmaker who says, “That’s exactly what I wanted. I got everything I needed. I made it just perfect. I’m going to put it out there.” And even most artists, most painters, even composers would want to come back and redo their work now. They’ve got a new perspective on it, they’ve got more resources, they have better technology, and they can fix or finish the things that were never done. … I wanted to actually finish the film the way it was meant to be when I was originally doing it. At the beginning, people went, “Don’t you like it?” I said, “Well, the film only came out to be 25 or 30 percent of what I wanted it to be.” They said, “What are you talking about?” So finally, I stopped saying that, but if you read any interviews for about an eight- or nine-year period there, it was all about how disappointed I was and how unhappy I was and what a dismal experience it was. You know, it’s too bad you need to get kind of half a job done and never get to finish it. So this was my chance to finish it.
 

AP: Why not release both the originals and special editions on DVD?

Lucas: The special edition, that’s the one I wanted out there. The other movie, it’s on VHS, if anybody wants it. … I’m not going to spend the, we’re talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn’t really exist anymore. It’s like this is the movie I wanted it to be, and I’m sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it. But I want it to be the way I want it to be. I’m the one who has to take responsibility for it. I’m the one who has to have everybody throw rocks at me all the time, so at least if they’re going to throw rocks at me, they’re going to throw rocks at me for something I love rather than something I think is not very good, or at least something I think is not finished.
 

AP: Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices?

Lucas: Not really. The movies are what the movies are. … The thing about science-fiction fans and “Star Wars” fans is they’re very independent-thinking people. They all think outside the box, but they all have very strong ideas about what should happen, and they think it should be their way. Which is fine, except I’m making the movies, so I should have it my way.
 

AP: After “Episode III,” will you ever revisit “Star Wars”?

Lucas: Ultimately, I’m going to probably move it into television and let other people take it. I’m sort of preserving the feature film part for what has happened and never go there again, but I can go off into various offshoots and things. You know, I’ve got offshoot novels, I’ve got offshoot comics. So it’s very easy to say, “Well, OK, that’s that genre, and I’ll find a really talented person to take it and create it.” Just like the comic books and the novels are somebody else’s way of doing it. I don’t mind that. Some of it might turn out to be pretty good. If I get the right people involved, it could be interesting.

I will cultivate patience to such a degree, that time itself will grow tired of waiting.
Author
Time
sorry about that, is there a way to pull a Lucas and re-edit.
I will cultivate patience to such a degree, that time itself will grow tired of waiting.
Author
Time
I've seen this same interview somewhere else.

Fox News? How ironic.
“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” — Nazi Reich Marshal Hermann Goering
Author
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: enommaz
sorry about that, is there a way to pull a Lucas and re-edit.


Oh heavens, no need to apologize!

I was just letting you know that it's already been covered, mostly so that you could look and see the responses already posted.

Here's the link to that original thread:
Here be what you seek.
For as much as some people claim to hate what Star Wars has become, they sure seem incapable of shutting up about it.
Author
Time
Whats Wrong with Fox?
They're the only news station that reports both sides of the issues and leave sit up to the people to draw conclusions. Stupid NBC, ABC and CBS only report the damn liberals.

If he'd gone on the Factor Bill would have shown him a clip of the interview where he denounced colorizing and torn him to shreds because he'd dodge the questions and stagger in the face of being challenged.


///
Fine, mister Lucas, while you're at it why dont you replace Lando with will smith?
Author
Time
It has nothing to do with Fox. This interview was conducted by the Associated Press (AP). It can be found on cnn.com as well.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/Movies/09/20/film.qa.george.lucas.ap/index.html
Author
Time
Ok, fair enough but you gotta admit that Lucas would get slaughtered on The Factor.

He hates flip floppers.

///
Fine, mister Lucas, while you're at it why dont you replace Lando with will smith?
Author
Time
I have to agree with you Kam, that would be a sight to see. lol
Author
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: Kam
Whats Wrong with Fox?
They're the only news station that reports both sides of the issues and leave sit up to the people to draw conclusions. Stupid NBC, ABC and CBS only report the damn liberals.

If he'd gone on the Factor Bill would have shown him a clip of the interview where he denounced colorizing and torn him to shreds because he'd dodge the questions and stagger in the face of being challenged.


///


Hah, George Lucas on The Factor would certainly be a sight for sore eyes, though I'm pretty sure that O'reilly couldn't make a solid segment out of harassing him on that one quote. I don't think any amount of rattling would convince Lucas to put the originals on DVD, anyway - at this point he's probably very well aware of all the well-deserved negativity he's receiving from the fans.

Oh, and dude, "Fox News" is hardly that. It's a convoluted form of news, yes, but not actual news as a journalist would define it. "The Factor," "Hannity and Colmes," etc. etc. are NOT news shows, just as Hardball is not a news show. It is an hour, or a half hour, of commentary, which the Fox News "anchors" also give while they report the day's headlines. So, if you watch it to watch commentary ABOUT what's going on in the world, that's fine, but it's not real news.
Author
Time
Lucas is missing the point. I understand his dissatisfaction, but Star Wars is not his to change. How many other people contributed to that trilogy, yet only his opinion is valid? If Lucas created Star Wars 100 percent, why are the prequels so inferior? Cause it's clear he's only working with yes-men this time around.

And as far as the VHS copies of the Original, they're out of print. You should know that George, you put them there.

Updating Special effects annoys me, but I can live with it. Changing actors is absurd. Luckily for Lucas, dead people can't put up much of a fight. As far as added scenes, they really destroy the pacing. I'd say Jabba's scene in ANH is more detrimental to Star Wars the Greedo shooting first. The scene is pointless and inane. Doesn't Han say exactly the same things he said to Greedo?

It's also odd when SE fans say 'you should be happy your getting Star Wars at all' when refering to tomorrow's dvd. Am I getting Star Wars? I consider tomorrow's dvd as much Star Wars as Lucas will after he comes out with all new 'improvements' in a few years.

"90% of the statistics used in quotes are made up."
Author
Time
I totally agree with you, man. Seriously, fans of the "Special Editions" really need to be asked the following question: at what point, at what degree of "change" in a film, do you consider the changed film to BE the original film only in name? In other words (this is hypothetical to make a point), if Lucas went in and replaced Obi-Wan a few years from now with Ewan McGregor in all 3 original films, completely changed Darth Vader's voice for some reason, and completely re-filmed entire portions of the movies, like the dogfights, to "update them" with newer technology, would they still consider the films to be Star Wars, ESB, and RoTJ? At what point, I'm asking, will one consider a changed movie to NOT be the original? For many, particularly film "purists," the slightest change denotes a new film.

For example, and this is also an example of a director LISTENING to his fanbase, anyone remember the re-release of E.T. a year or 2 ago? That's right, where they replaced the guns with walkie-talkies, added ass-bad CGI E.T., and took out "insensitive" lines? Many, MANY folks considered the revamped version to NOT be the original film, for good reason. My other point is that, originally, Spielberg planned to release ONLY the new version of E.T. in DVD form, but after much protest from the movie-going public, particularly fans, he changed his mind and released both versions in one set.
Author
Time
Doesn't the theatrical version of ET on the DVD have the terrorist line changed as well?

Gentlemen, you can’t fight in here, this is the war room!

Author
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: bad_karma24
Doesn't the theatrical version of ET on the DVD have the terrorist line changed as well?


Yes, the NEW theatrical version from 200x (i think 2002?). But the original, unedited version is included in the DVD, which of course contains the terrorist line.
Author
Time
im so sick of hearing Lucas use that BS "these are not how i wanted the films to be... im sry if you fell in love with a half completed film" crap....
but its obvious it works for him so he'll be repeating this explanation any and everytime someone asks this question...

i wonder if he thought up that response himself or got his PR people to do it...
"Never. I'll never turn to the darkside. You've failed your highness. I am a jedi, like my father before me."
Author
Time
The new E.T version was better. I like E.T as a digital character. I didn't like the gun earsing (just as long as Speilburg doesn't take his no guns policy to Saving Private Ryan) but overal I feel the same way about it as the Star Wars Special Editions. Still it is good Speilburg contained both versions.
Author
Time
Oh dear Christ no. The digital E.T. looked like garbage. To make him fit in, you have to replace him in every scene. No thanks. I've got my original.
"You fell victim to one of the classic blunders, the most famous of which is 'Never get involved in a land war in Asia'."
--Vizzini (Wallace Shawn), The Princess Bride
-------------------------
Kevin A
Webmaster/Primary Cynic
kapgar.typepad.com
kapgar.com
Author
Time
Quote

The new E.T version was better. I like E.T as a digital character.


lol oh man...
you get better and better as time goes on jimbo
"Never. I'll never turn to the darkside. You've failed your highness. I am a jedi, like my father before me."
Author
Time
A writer, producer and executive producer were lost in the desert.

All of a sudden, the writer spots this big jug of arrowhead Mountain Spring Water.

He raced towards it, but the executives saw the jug and overtook him.. to his horror, the two men started pissing into the bottle.

"What the hell are you doing????"

The producers looked at the writer "Improving it!"

///
Fine, mister Lucas, while you're at it why dont you replace Lando with will smith?
Author
Time
From the San Francisco Chronicle here in the Bay Area:

Quote

"I have become the very thing that I was trying to avoid," Lucas laments, pointing out that he used to fight corporations before becoming one himself, "which is basically what part of 'Star Wars' is about."


There it is from the man himself. At least he knows that he's an evil empire, which makes it all the more aggravating when he says he won't release the OT despite the wishes of his core fanbase.

As much as I try not to badmouth him and be mindful that he created the whole thing, I can't help but think, "What an egomaniacal asshole!!" *sigh*

Speaking of the SF Chronicle article (read here: SF Chronicle review), it's yet another kiss-ass one. I actually wrote the guy and directed him to this web site and asked him to read the petition. It's so annoying (but expected) to have all these mainstream media outlets refer to us dissatisfied SW fans as if we were a miniscule "Rebel faction." We definitely are in the minority, but 63,000 signatures (not to mention the negative reviews on Amazon and other sites) should at least show that there's ALOT of people pissed off about this.
Author
Time
If Lucas is only complaining about the cost of remastering the originals to DVD, why not just to do a really cheap transfer. To me, the grittyness would only bring out more of the beauty in the films.

Amazing Sound and Picture doesn't make a movie any better, just more enjoyable. Empire Strikes Back on a 8" Black and White tv is still an amazing movie.
"90% of the statistics used in quotes are made up."