Originally posted by: Rikter
- The VOICE OVER IS GONE that's not a major change? - IT REALLY changes the feel of the movie IMHO
Originally posted by: digitalfreaknyc
Sorry but no, i don't think it's a major change. It's not as if he narrated the whole freakin' movie. They were interspersed through it at various points but it didn't add anything. No one wanted it there in the first place. It's better off without it.
Completely disagree. There is VERY little changed between the original cut and the directors cut but what IS changed is a lot better. I'll be posting my dual-layer version soon.
Originally posted by: Rikter
Now go and BUY the directors cut - BUT make sure you get the original also (it's WAY better then the Directors Cut!!)
RiK
Originally posted by: Adamwankenobi
HO-LY SHIT! After some googling, I've found that that film is...VERY popular! Check this site on wikipedia, which proves people's devotion to it, which you guys would be interested in:
Wikipedia Blade Runner article
HO-LY SHIT! After some googling, I've found that that film is...VERY popular! Check this site on wikipedia, which proves people's devotion to it, which you guys would be interested in:
Wikipedia Blade Runner article
Now go and BUY the directors cut - BUT make sure you get the original also (it's WAY better then the Directors Cut!!)
RiK
Sorry but no, i don't think it's a major change. It's not as if he narrated the whole freakin' movie. They were interspersed through it at various points but it didn't add anything. No one wanted it there in the first place. It's better off without it.
Completely disagree. There is VERY little changed between the original cut and the directors cut but what IS changed is a lot better. I'll be posting my dual-layer version soon.
- The VOICE OVER IS GONE that's not a major change? - IT REALLY changes the feel of the movie IMHO