Originally posted by: Warbler
now I'm
If the Superman I & II are to be used as backround for this movie then by definition, its a sequel. Either their part of the same universe are they aren't.
I think casting Spacey as Luther was a great move. I can see him doing very well in the part.
Originally posted by: yanksno1
They really confused people by saying it would "follow" Superman I & II but it's not to be a direct sequal. Though as HotRod said we all can agree those films shouldn't exsist so it's ok for this film to be a sequel to Superman II.
!
They really confused people by saying it would "follow" Superman I & II but it's not to be a direct sequal. Though as HotRod said we all can agree those films shouldn't exsist so it's ok for this film to be a sequel to Superman II.
! now I'm
If the Superman I & II are to be used as backround for this movie then by definition, its a sequel. Either their part of the same universe are they aren't. I think casting Spacey as Luther was a great move. I can see him doing very well in the part.
I think this Superman is supposed to be the remake of an idealized sequel. Get it?
About Spacey: I don't like casting him, not because of his acting - which is great btw - but because it kinda carrer-damaging. He'll probably do it like he did in Usual Suspects, off-key pseudo-villain guy.