logo Sign In

Post #1328111

Author
ShamanWhill
Parent topic
The Sequels - George's Original Trilogy
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1328111/action/topic#1328111
Date created
7-Mar-2020, 8:17 PM

NFBisms said:

I mean, unless we’re discussing what about them that it isn’t. Like, I think, TROS is way way off, but TFA is at least vague, and TLJ is slavish in its adherence to George Lucas’s Force and Jedi. So when I bring up the Disney films I’m not actually discussing from a perspective of them as canon, but just parsing out what about them fit and what would have been done about those ideas, if at all, in the hypothetical universe where Lucas got to make his sequels. I think context for how they’re referenced in this thread matters, if you want to police it that badly. I don’t think I’ve used them as proof of a point, just a jumping off point for the discussion on what Lucas would mean with the concept of “balance.”

Sorry for the confusion NFBisms. I was not actually thinking of you when I had made that comment earlier. I hope you don’t take offense, as I did leave those accused nameless. I don’t mean to police this thread, so much as I want us to “stay on target”.

I find your perception that TLJ is slavish in it’s adherence to George’s perception of the Force, quizzical. I personally don’t think George would approve of the ability to project oneself through the Force to another star system. The film also misunderstood George’s definition of balance in the Force.