logo Sign In

Post #1317145

Author
DominicCobb
Parent topic
The Rise Of Skywalker — Official Review and Opinions Thread
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1317145/action/topic#1317145
Date created
3-Jan-2020, 5:26 PM

Voss Caltrez said:

DominicCobb said:

You’re missing the point I think, taking things a bit too literally. The goal of the original Star Wars film was for you to feel the unique thrill of being dropped into a serial halfway through, but obviously it’s not exactly the same.

My point is mostly that in old serials, be it Flash Gordon, Gene Autry, Batman, Zorro, whoever, there was always the presumption, even at the end of the serial, that there would be some other threat, some other adventure on the horizon that they’d be there to stop. Lucas has compared Star Wars to James Bond a lot and it’s the same idea. Again, obviously rendered very differently.

My point is, that just because it’s inspired by Flash Gordon doesn’t mean you have to have it be just like Flash Gordon, or Batman. I think it should aspire to be better than those serials. And again, I feel like Star Wars was an amalgamation of many different inspirations, to the point that it became its own thing.

Like I said they’re obviously very different. I just mean in the very basic sense it’s exploring that idea that “there will always be bad guys out there,” as opposed to the ROTJ ending (especially within PT framing) which suggests the dark side has been destroyed for good. In my mind the first two ST films were telling a pretty quality story along those lines.

I’m fine with him coming back, but just having it explained that he survived ROTJ? That’s it? Luke and Yoda didn’t feel a disturbance in the Force during this time?
If the bar is serials from 80 years ago okay fine. But that’s a low bar to me.

I wasn’t talking about Palpatine coming back. You’re confusing my posts with yotsuya.