Marjorie Eaton with chimp eyes looks like “a guy in a cheap mask”, whilst Ian McDiarmid in cheap ROTS makeup looks “remastered”.
I don’t share that opinion, either.
Both have make up effects applied, the original holds up poorly whereas Ians make up looks a lot more organic and believable. In fact while watching the original version i always felt the emperors face was about to melt off at any stage of the movie.
https://images.app.goo.gl/kVczqCH7ggaiEoDM9Well, if you compare Revisited Palpatine to OUT Palpatine, of course the former’s gonna look superior to the latter.
I assumed that was the comparison :p
Unless there is yet another change i haven’t seen.We’re discussing the 2004 change where George replaced the original ESB Emperor with the horrible RotS monster face Emperor. Not Adywan’s excellent fanedit.
I honestly never noticed the difference, in my mind the emperor was always Ian.
See, now this is the kind of stuff I can’t believe is said on a site dedicated to preserving the OUT.