I mentioned that one before. It’s one of the only moments in the entire film when the camera does that. The fact that that’s your only example does not help your case.
It’s not the camera at all, it’s intentional. This is what it would look like if stabilised:
I honestly have no idea what you’re trying to say.
No, the camera is shaking in that scene because it is a sort of ‘action’ scene, where they’re trying to repair the Falcon before the toxic fumes kill them. It’s one of only two dialogue scenes in the entire film with “shaky cam.”
There’s shaky cam when Finn takes off his helmet, basically any shot that has an extreme-close up like that has some level of it or some other annoying camera technique (lots of zooming, lots of focus-shifting), when they get to the bar that entire scene is filmed like it’s hand-held.
Double checked the scene to make sure I’m not crazy, and, yep, sure enough, zero shaky cam in that scene. Once again I have to ask if you even know what the term means.
The bar scene is not handheld. It is mostly steadicam. These are different terms that have different meanings.
And the action scenes don’t have shaky cam either.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sarFZJl3h0
There’s what? Two, three shots total in this scene that if you squint you could call almost shaky cam? And I just picked a random scene.
Much of that shot and for that matter the movie feels like it’s framed for 1.85:1 not Scope (2.35:1) - i.e. the camera feels like it’s too close.
What does that have to do with shaky cam?
Honestly there’s a ton of shaky-cam in that scene, I don’t know how you could possibly count two or three shots only. It’s not just shaky-cam, it’s a combination of things.
You must have a very liberal definition of shaky cam then. Do you think there’s any shaky cam in these scenes?
https://youtu.be/wtoHjGWc2s8?t=200
https://youtu.be/T_OSeRxhGOY?t=62