i see you’ve brainwashed oojason for example, who claims to deal with facts while only spilling lies, your lies, only your side of the story. half truths are lies too, man.
To my own detriment at times I am very much my own person, and not easily taken in by ‘sides’, ‘claims’ and ‘agendas’. Everything I posted in the Sports thread was factually correct (if somewhat of a restrained version from myself). Some people may not like it, some may disagree, some may choose to believe others - that is up to them to do so.
It certainly wasn’t Jay’s side of the story as anyone can see from that thread - plus Jay can speak for himself, as I do for me.
That Frink chose that particular thread and seemingly had a dig to try and engage me in some sort of attempt to extract a reaction from me is on him. That he didn’t like the info & suggestion given him - and his reaction to that is on him. As well as seemingly continuing his similar actions which earnt him a temp-ban a few weeks ago. I’ve seen since he has deleted his posts in other threads around the forum attempting to continue his agenda / issues / unhappiness with Jay / mods / site / me (or a combination of).
The mods have banned him since - and others too. I’ve nothing to say on the ban (as it’s not for me to do so) though will say Frink was made aware - clearly - of what would happen should he continue. Yet he (seemingly) chose to do so regardless.
thanks jay. you managed to fuck everything up. please, go drive into a tree.
Apart from the many insults in the thread to someone who decided in the best interests of the site to remove the political threads for a while (likely in a bid to try and raise the level of civility too) - as someone who has been on the wrong end of a couple of serious car accidents - with people not as fortunate as I was, that’s a shite, disgusting and crass thing to say.
I’m sorry to say maybe the site is indeed better off without people who think as you do.