Warbler said:
Even if he did lose some of his memory while drunk, it doesn’t prove he assaulted her.Do you even realize how low you and the republicans have just set the bar for being a supreme court justice!? So it’s acceptable for a supreme court appointee to have had past problems with alcohol, even if they lie by denying it, and even in the presence of sworn testimony by a respected professor that said drunkenness led to sexual assault, so long as that particular assault can’t be PROVEN beyond a reasonable doubt.
I would hardly classify getting drunk at a high school party as having an alcohol problem.
The rest though I agree sets the bar pretty low.