Warbler said:
Even if he did lose some of his memory while drunk, it doesn’t prove he assaulted her.Do you even realize how low you and the republicans have just set the bar for being a supreme court justice!?
Me and Republicans? Please don’t include me with them. I think my own thoughts.
So it’s acceptable for a supreme court appointee to have had past problems with alcohol,
Yes, if they are truly in the past and not in the present.
even if they lie by denying it,
Maybe not.
and even in the presence of sworn testimony by a respected professor that said drunkenness led to sexual assault, so long as that particular assault can’t be PROVEN beyond a reasonable doubt.
I don’t know.