The book came after him pretending to be under attack by the government and his university even though all evidence pointed to the contrary.
Censorship by the university, no. I think he has a good argument against the Canadian government.
But his main contribution, I think, has been helping young men take responsibility for their lives through his lectures and his book, which actually makes some use of his expertise in psychology.
Then he inevitably comes back to censorship and Marxism and how it’s everywhere and it’s going to end the world. At which point I tune out.
I guess what I’m trying to say is that he’s a mixed bag for me.