- Time
- Post link
Wilford Brimley isn’t even on the poster. That’s hilarious.
Battle For Endor was released theatrically overseas. The German poster is wonderfully misleading.
Where were you in '77?
Wilford Brimley isn’t even on the poster. That’s hilarious.
Grumpy old hermits were just not going to sell this thing. 😉
Who the guy on the poster is supposed to be, I have no idea.
Where were you in '77?
That’s Wilford back when he originally crashed on Endor. 😉
That’s Wilford back when he originally crashed on Endor. 😉
I actually saw someone say elsewhere that it’s his long dead business partner. We only ever see them as a skeleton in the dungeon of the Marauder’s castle. 😛
Where were you in '77?
But it’s not on brand. As a company they need to pretend all of this stuff is one clean Star Wars product from the spin-offs to the toys they sell. No weird dance-offs at their theme parks, no special features on DVDs that suggest any behind the scenes drama. And so it’s keeping with that line of thinking if they say yes, George Lucas created all of this and it was always this way. I’d love to think otherwise but I can’t imagine any other outcome. The theatrical release of the OOT is probably treated with contempt like the old EU now.
You are wrong and always will be. The hope and patient persistence of our cause will always triumph over the hopelessness of those like you. The answer is not to become downtrodden at any point but continue onwards to our self made victory.
What the heck are you even saying. I’m talking about reality of corporate think tanks and you’re quoting audiobooks on the power of positive thinking.
I’m talking about reality of corporate think tanks and you’re quoting audiobooks on the power of positive thinking.
ALLOL!
Well, I look at it this way:we might bet the OOT before we ever get The Abyss and True Lies on Blu-ray. Whoopee.
At this point they’re probably just waiting for the right time to put it out on 4k.
Edited to clarify: I was talking about The Abyss and True Lies, not the OOT.
On the basis of the DNRed mess we got for T2, that’s not encouraging.
“What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.”
Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death
I don’t like the sound of this:
Unlike its sibling television studio, Fox’s movie studio is expected to be significantly downsized once the deal is complete. Disney will likely take over Fox’s two biggest film franchises, Avatar and the X-Men, and scale back production of costly movies that don’t fit its family-friendly, franchise-focused formula, people close to both companies have said.
I would put this in my sig if I weren’t so lazy.
Unfortunate, but unsurprising.
Look on the bright side — the collapse of western civilization is inevitable. Once it crumbles, so too will Disney. Then once civilization gets back on its feet, it’s public domain all the way, baby!
Seems to defeat one purpose for getting Fox in the first place. Disney has released R rated films and other edgy fare under their Touchstone and Hollywood Pictures banners since the 80’s, why mess with Fox if it’s not broke?
They’d better hope the Avatar deal is ironclad, or Cameron might shop the new films around to another studio. 😉
A PG-13 Deadpool movie would also be kind of pointless.
Where were you in '77?
This is why Disney buying them out was a really horrible thing.
The Person in Question
Deadpool has the kind of jokes in it that they fired James Gunn for making, so in a way this was always incoming. They did use to have Touchstone releases as mentioned above, but I wonder if that era has passed? I’m unsure what they’re involved in these days.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchstone_Pictures
Merely a label than a production arm these days. Last time I saw the logo was in front of Lucasfilm’s Strange Magic.
Once upon a time, Disney was jittery enough about Who Framed Roger Rabbit and The Nightmare Before Christmas that both were released under the Touchstone banner.
Will they stop spending the money generated by properties they don’t fit the Disney mold? Avatar is hardly a family film to begin with. 😛
Where were you in '77?
If they only want the family-friendly stuff, why not move the remaining Marvel, SW, and other properties they’re interested in into Disney then sell the remainder of the studio to someone else?
I would put this in my sig if I weren’t so lazy.
They wouldn’t hold a monopoly, then.
Miramax continued to release plenty of stuff that wasn’t “family friendly” even after they were bought out by Disney.
If they only want the family-friendly stuff, why not move the remaining Marvel, SW, and other properties they’re interested in into Disney then sell the remainder of the studio to someone else?
Because then people would have something else to watch that isn’t from Disney.
I wanna make a Disney being a monopoly joke as well.
It isn’t a joke. It’s a fact based on observable reality.
The Person in Question
Oh, but it is a joke. A cruel, spiteful joke against the whole of human civilization.
Europe-related tidbits:
http://disneytvanimation.com/post/178185228328/disneyfox-comcasts-30b-takeover-of-sky-to-be
http://disneytvanimation.com/post/178185684048/european-regulators-set-october-21-deadline-for
And the new owner of Sky is…Comcast!:
Also, Ben Sherwood leaving come the merger:
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ben-sherwood-s-expected-disney-exit-confirmed-by-sky-sale-comcast-1146298
And the new owner of Sky is…Comcast!:
Also, Ben Sherwood leaving come the merger:
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ben-sherwood-s-expected-disney-exit-confirmed-by-sky-sale-comcast-1146298
I have a feeling Disney will try to buy Comcast next.