Frink, in my responses I already accepted it could have been more precise and that I understand the assumption you made. I still don’t understand the significance of your objection. If I had just pulled a yearly number like mfm suggests, I’d get it. I did nothing remotely like that.

I fully recognize the technical point that a person could make the assumption it was s mass shooting (as I did with Collipso’s post months ago) but it wasn’t my intent. I don’t understand your fixation what amounts to a flimsy debating point.