logo Sign In

Post #1220862

Author
Warbler
Parent topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1220862/action/topic#1220862
Date created
28-Jun-2018, 4:15 PM

chyron8472 said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

I can understand having a rule about how long one can look at someone.

Really? What’s the correct length of time allowed then?

Not exactly sure but certainly longer than 5 seconds. Perhaps 30 seconds?(note I am not saying that just beaue someone stares for less time should automatically mean they don’t get in trouble: context, circumstances, etc would depend)

30 seconds? Ha. Stare at your watch for 30 seconds. See how long it really is.

it is 30 seconds long.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTlVc_hKi2M
“People do not have internal chronometers.”

true.

Staring at someone for 5 full seconds is longer than long enough when given no reason to stare.

I was under the mistaken impression that

  1. the rule existed(it does not)
  2. the rule gave no consideration to the reason for staring.