But judges?
I don’t understand.
Frink occasionally mocks conservatives/Republicans who rationalize Trump’s victory because at least we get judges we like. The implication is “but judges” is a weaksauce excuse for Trump.
It’s a “weaksauce” excuse because the judges that conservatives want are horrible. They’re typically family-values, police state, corporate piles of shit.
Well if that’s the kind of thing a conservative likes, that sounds like a pretty good excuse. I take Frink’s phrasing to mean that even if you like those judges that isn’t a good enough excuse for Trump.
I think many conservatives will rethink their support of a conservative court once they see how certain issues are decided. When it comes to privacy issues especially the libertarian-minded conservatives won’t always be pleased.
As they say, “Darkness rises and Light to meet it”.