logo Sign In

Last movie seen — Page 605

Author
Time
 (Edited)

LuckyGungan2001 said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

paja said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

This reminds me of a sappy early '00s song I’d much rather keep far in the back of my mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehToBz7zhqE

Oh wait!, wrong year.

I’d say it’s up for debate whether or not 2004 counts as part of the early '00s.

But it’s this song I’m talking about.

Wow, over 400 million views? I’ve never heard this song in my life.

Please stop it. This song was terrible and I used to hear it all the time.

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

Handman said:

Syndrome was the perfect villain. The more I think on it, the more the sequel doesn’t compare to the original in the slightest. But I still enjoyed it for what it is.

Funnily enough, those good sequels are the only two Pixar films I skipped on watching. I saw Cars 2, and lost interest in ever seeing another one of those, and I didn’t find the time to see Finding Dory. I’m not sure if I’d like them, though. Monsters University was not too great.

It doesn’t live up to the original because it can’t, by definition, as a sequel, given why the original was so great. It’s novelty, the cleverness of the dozen references to other movies (Bond, War of the Worlds, every super hero movie ever, 2001, just off the top of my head). The sequel was never going to live up to that because it takes place in an existing paradigm.

It’s also incredibly messy. There are a lot of conflicting character motivations and not everything really adds up. The brilliantness of the original wasn’t just novelty. If it were, we wouldn’t be talking about it after the hundreds of other superhero movies that followed. And references aren’t clever, the film examines the mid-life crisis, the role of family, etc. etc. etc. in a unique way that the sequel almost drops entirely or has little more to add.

But the sequel is still a lot of fun.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Handman said:

LuckyGungan2001 said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

paja said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

This reminds me of a sappy early '00s song I’d much rather keep far in the back of my mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehToBz7zhqE

Oh wait!, wrong year.

I’d say it’s up for debate whether or not 2004 counts as part of the early '00s.

But it’s this song I’m talking about.

Wow, over 400 million views? I’ve never heard this song in my life.

Please stop it. This song was terrible and I used to hear it all the time.

He was only a toddler at the time.

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

Handman said:

LuckyGungan2001 said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

paja said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

This reminds me of a sappy early '00s song I’d much rather keep far in the back of my mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehToBz7zhqE

Oh wait!, wrong year.

I’d say it’s up for debate whether or not 2004 counts as part of the early '00s.

But it’s this song I’m talking about.

Wow, over 400 million views? I’ve never heard this song in my life.

Please stop it. This song was terrible and I used to hear it all the time.

He was only a toddler at the time.

By “it” I meant “making me feel old”. I used to be with it, but then they changed what “it” is.

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

Handman said:

LuckyGungan2001 said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

paja said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

This reminds me of a sappy early '00s song I’d much rather keep far in the back of my mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehToBz7zhqE

Oh wait!, wrong year.

I’d say it’s up for debate whether or not 2004 counts as part of the early '00s.

But it’s this song I’m talking about.

Wow, over 400 million views? I’ve never heard this song in my life.

Please stop it. This song was terrible and I used to hear it all the time.

He was only a toddler at the time.

Well obviously, but there are tonnes of “well known” songs from when I was little or even from before my birth that I know really well.

Not enough people read the EU.

Author
Time

LuckyGungan2001 said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Handman said:

LuckyGungan2001 said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

paja said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

This reminds me of a sappy early '00s song I’d much rather keep far in the back of my mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehToBz7zhqE

Oh wait!, wrong year.

I’d say it’s up for debate whether or not 2004 counts as part of the early '00s.

But it’s this song I’m talking about.

Wow, over 400 million views? I’ve never heard this song in my life.

Please stop it. This song was terrible and I used to hear it all the time.

He was only a toddler at the time.

Well obviously, but there are tonnes of “well known” songs from when I was little or even from before my birth that I know really well.

That song was probably popular for a period of six years at most. I doubt anyone who isn’t a Millennial even remembers it.

Author
Time

I remembered it pretty well, though I hadn’t heard it in a while.

.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Been awhile -

Solo: A Star Wars Story (2018) - A film that comes dangerously close to generic summer blockbuster with too much fan service, but makes it out very much alive do to a unique sense of style and approach to the Star Wars galaxy, and a great cast with a fantastic lead performance. The emotional core doesn’t quite transcend the way the best summer blockbusters do, but it’s still fun and funny. Could have been even more so, but this will do just fine. B+

Silverado (1985) - Pretty good old fashioned western. Plot’s a little all over the place, but you’re really there for the characters and their interactions (and the action). B

Fahrenheit 451 (2018) - Bit of some wasted potential. Good cast, good aesthetics, good reinterpretation of a classic. Kinda falls apart. C+

You’ve Got Mail (1998) - Pretty silly with or without the dated AOL stuff. Yet… still a diverting experience. Didn’t hate it at all. C+

Hereditary (2018) - Beautifully twisted work of terror, both in the ‘horror’ scenes and in the family scenes. It’s a good one. B

Demolition Man (1993) - Dumb all around, but in an enjoyable way I suppose. C+

Con Air (1997) - Dumb all around, but in an enjoyable way I suppose. C+

Bad Boys (1995) - Michael Bay’s name kept me away from this one for awhile, which is kind of unfortunate. As juvenile as this movie admittedly is, it’s actually a whole lot of fun. That’s mainly to do with Smith and Lawrence, honestly the action parts are when I zone out. B

Bad Boys II (2003) - Basically the first one turned up to eleven, except this time the action’s pretty good. B+

Ocean’s 8 (2018) - Fairly straightforward in terms of Ocean’s heists, but just as satisfying as ever, with the new cast making it worth the trip.

The Incredibles 2 (2018) - What more could you want? An absolutely fantastic follow up to a classic that feels of remarkably of a piece with the first, all the more, uh, incredible because of the long gap between. Worth it. A-

The Lost World (1925) - A really quite impressive (effects-wise) proto-King Kong sort of feature. Plot and characters are basic, but that’s not why you’re watching. B

The Impossible (2012) - A finely crafted, harrowing film. You’re enthralled almost from go. B+

The Orphanage (2007) - Another finely crafted, harrowing film. Freaky and spooky, but also rooted in depressing realness. B+

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom (2018) - I saw this and liked it. Then I saw it again, and almost loved it. There’s something really captivating about this film, and something that makes me think it’s almost definitely the best since the original. Despite plot and structural similarities to other in the series, it feels like they’re finally doing something new. Ultimately, it’s all because of the aesthetics and execution. This is a gothic horror film from start to finish, and somehow, despite not really caring about the characters any more than I did during the first one, I’m fully invested. Bayona actually knows how to create a suspenseful sequence, and this is filled to the brim with them. Lot of fun. B+

American Animals (2018) - An endlessly fascinating portrait of when the angst of becoming an adult goes too far. Unexpectedly one of the most thrilling films I’ve seen in awhile. Probably because it all feels so real, and makes more sense than it should. A-

Treasure Island (1950) - Pretty basic with a fair few bits of genuine excitement. B-

Death Becomes Her (1992) - While I appreciate the wacky and unique sense of humor (and what at the time were cutting edge effects), ultimately it’s not as funny as it wants to be, and Willis’s turn in the climax is unearned and seems to undermine the satire. Still, not bad. C+

Author
Time

I thought Death Becomes Her was a horror film though.

I mean I haven’t seen it since 1992 but that sounded ridiculous the moment it happened…

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV’s Frink said:

Sure.

Shucks, Frink — you’re right. After all, a movie featuring

  1. Undead women with damaged, decaying bodies
  2. Charred, smoking corpses
  3. Creepy, crying nuns who glide rather than walk

isn’t the least bit macabre. That’s just typical family fare.

Author
Time

The 40 Year Old Virgin – Someone once called me something to this effect when I was in middle school. Kind of a weird thing to say to a kid.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Handman said:

The 40 Year Old Virgin – Someone once called me something to this effect when I was in middle school. Kind of a weird thing to say to a kid.

There’s this one kid who uses the word “virgin” to insult me, when he is also a virgin.

Not enough people read the EU.

Author
Time

Handman said:

The 40 Year Old Virgin – Someone once called me something to this effect when I was in middle school. Kind of a weird thing to say to a kid.

I watched this recently too. Really enjoyed it. I always assumed it was garbage raunchy comedy, but it’s actually very thoughtful.

TV’s Frink said:

I would put this in my sig if I weren’t so lazy.

Author
Time

It is garbage raunchy comedy, but it has something to say.

Author
Time

LuckyGungan2001 said:

Handman said:

The 40 Year Old Virgin – Someone once called me something to this effect when I was in middle school. Kind of a weird thing to say to a kid.

There’s this one kid who uses the word “virgin” to insult me, when he is also a virgin.

Shuddup, virgin!

.

Author
Time

The Da Vinci Code: wow i loved this. the story was really interesting, and the plot twists were all pretty effective to me. tom hanks, sir ian mckellen and paul bettany are great on this.

overall i tend to really enjoy mystery/suspense movies, and i also tend to really enjoy reading or watching stuff about conspiracy theories, so this was a piece of cake to me.

really really enjoyable experience, i should’ve watched this a long time ago.

10/10

Author
Time

Collipso said:

The Da Vinci Code: wow i loved this. the story was really interesting, and the plot twists were all pretty effective to me. tom hanks, sir ian mckellen and paul bettany are great on this.

overall i tend to really enjoy mystery/suspense movies, and i also tend to really enjoy reading or watching stuff about conspiracy theories, so this was a piece of cake to me.

really really enjoyable experience, i should’ve watched this a long time ago.

10/10

One of the most thrilling novels I ever read. The movie was lame.

TV’s Frink said:

I would put this in my sig if I weren’t so lazy.

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

TV’s Frink said:

Sure.

Shucks, Frink — you’re right. After all, a movie featuring

  1. Undead women with damaged, decaying bodies
  2. Charred, smoking corpses
  3. Creepy, crying nuns who glide rather than walk

isn’t the least bit macabre. That’s just typical family fare.

Just because a movie features those elements doesn’t make it horror. It’s never played for scares, always for laughs.

I also don’t remember any charred and/or smoking corpses.

Author
Time

Tucker and Dale vs Evil is totally horror too then.

Author
Time

It might be. I can’t say for sure because I only lasted 10 minutes before giving up on it.