I suggested he go read up on it himself. If he found something to counter what I posted, he’d be perfectly welcome to share it and refute what I said. I’m open to being proven wrong and corrected.
But you said you’re not going to post articles to back up your claims.
So not only do I have to find sources to inform myself, but also to prove you’re not blowing smoke when responding to the conversation.
If you want to give credibility to things you say in a debate, you need to cite where you get your information from.
You acted like citing sources in this thread to substantiate an argument is an infantile activity. As though such a practice is beneath you.
Frink did your reading for you, see above. It editorializes in parts, but it’s not grossly unfair.
Jay said:
I do the same when the right is intellectually dishonest.I’ve yet to see this happen.
Must never have happened then.