Despite all its problems, one of the good things about social media is interacting with people who have different views . . .
By the way, what happened to this?
It hasn’t changed, but sometimes you have to recognize when you’re arguing with a wall and spare your own sanity.
Since I was not being a wall in those arguments, and everyone in this thread can see that, I’ll just infer that the reason you refuse to address my points is because you can’t address them. You ignored most of my points in my earlier posts before deciding that I was beneath you anyway, so this isn’t exactly surprising to me.
Everyone in the thread can see a great many things, mon ami. At this point a ronto should enter the frame.
This makes absolutely no sense.
I suspect it means that you are being a wall, but you don’t see it because you don’t want to. Hence the reference to the ANH:SE ronto.
Well why not just say that?
Have you just met Mrebo? He delights in not just saying things.
That’s true. Plus I obviously wasn’t being a wall in that conversation, though I think I might just go back to being a wall because no distinction is made between real discourse and being a wall.
Frink is no less adept at not just saying things, preferring sarcasm and interjections that miss the point.
I don’t like to debate the debate. In the debate itself my posts were all very direct. You making post after post about Jay not engaging with you didn’t merit the same seriousness.
The funny thing is that I was actually engaging him in most of those posts about him not engaging me, not you.
Have you ever once made a post where you just clearly state your position? I don’t think I’ve ever seen you do it. This is a serious question by the way, I really don’t I’ve ever seen you put forth your position in a straightforward manner.