You respond to what you infer rather than what you read. I can’t productively debate that mindset.
I’m going to take my own advice that I’ve often handed out to others here and not respond further.
That’s unfortunate. My post was totally reasonable though, so I’m disappointed that you can’t address what I said, especially since only one small part of it was commenting on your defense of the right. I really wanted to hear your comments on the deaths of the supposedly Hamas children that made up 15% of the death toll in the Israel killings, but I guess that isn’t worth responding to either because I made a rational inference about your political leanings. As for that inference, when the only thing you’ve done in all of my interactions with you in this thread is defend the right and attack the left while using conservative talkings about the media and socialism, I can assume that you are more opposed to the left than the right. There’s nothing irrational about that inference. It’s totally reasonable and I actually would argue that I’d be incredibly imperceptive to not see or comment on that obvious implication. You also made several inferences about me that were far less linear when you were defending Jordan Peterson and I didn’t walk away from the conversation.
I also would’ve liked to hear you address my point on why the Democrats will not continue to lose in future elections, but I guess I won’t get an answer to that either.