Pretty much what I expected.
You linked to an article that said
There is no reason for Joi to be naked here
which is completely false, as I just pointed out.
Obviously “there is no reason for Joi to be naked here” = “there is no good reason for Joi to be naked here.”
If the article was effectively arguing there was no “good reason,” they would have argued why the reason that was there wasn’t good, rather than ignoring that reason at all as if it doesn’t exist.
You can claim that’s also false, but that’s just your opinion.
Whether I’d claim it as “false” or not would depend on his argument… but since he didn’t present that argument I cannot comment on it.