I think voting for none of the above is a meaningful choice. Third parties have little hope if we must insist they can’t win. I get the pragmatic consideration of picking somebody who can win, who is even marginally better, but there are other valid ways of weighing who to vote for.

I’m fine with Frink or whoever else thinking it’s crazy, but in the last election I didn’t see a marginally better choice.

The notion that everybody should obviously have voted for Clinton is nonsense. I think all of America should have refrained from voting in 2016.