And another problem (and a really dirty trick from discographies) is to make people believe that anything labered “Hi-Res” is automatically better, even when the source material is 16 bit or <48kHz digital audio. In this link there are some examples: http://archimago.blogspot.com.es/2013/07/list-suspected-44-or-48khz-pcm.html . Plus no DAC can reach actual 24 bit resolution unless I’m mistaken. And the soundtracks of the OT are, well… very old at this point. Even if 24/192 were better, I hardly believe those soundtracks has non-random high frequency information. They were recorded with already very old and limited technology.
The mastering behind 24/192 releases can be better than the mastering of earlier and newer Redbook releases, but how do we know the latter are been intentionally sabotaged or are the same mastering as the “Hi-Res” version? You have that problem with SACDs, or digital releases.