BTW, about this argument of semantics thing: when you say that truth and facts are not the same thing, or when you say that some evidences are reproducible and some are not, or when you say that testimony is an evidence in a legal meaning, or when you say that there can be evidence of truth that is also itself not fact, it is ALSO an argument of semantics.
Well, to give context, I work for a law firm. So my understanding of “evidence” and “testimony” includes the legal meaning. If I do, and someone else does not, then I imagine the issue is not who is wrong or right, but how we collectively define terms here.