The “put a cowl” line is also the opposite of a latent sexuality since it clearly denies it. I thought it was a very clever removal.
What better way to include latent sexuality than by ‘clearly’ denying it? 😉
And thanks, Darthrush! That’s a good question. I think this edit will be a fairly lightweight one. Sort of like my old prequel edits (2006ish). If I can trim away what cringe moments I can (subjective), perhaps the rest won’t be as bothersome. And if I can remove a good swatch of the Canto Bight digression, perhaps the subplot can still feel solid enough while reducing the runtime a little.