You say that stuff all the time so forgive me for not understanding your stance.
You must be thinking of somebody else.
In challenging chyron’s unabashed certainty what are you looking for? To understand his reasons? Granted, chyron has conceded he doesn’t feel competent to defend his reasons and has thus disclaimed any desire to do so. Make of that what you will, but how many pages should be spent on deriding his certainty?
Then there is a post like Zig with his spaghetti monster sarcasm.
I can only guess that the intent is compel him to admit a level of doubt you think a reasonable person should hold. It’s rather like going after a guy to compel him to admit that maybe, just maybe, his wife doesn’t love him and is going to leave him. Even if he has all kinds of “evidence” to the contrary and utter conviction, those on the outside can suspect it is nonetheless plausible.