The conversation though was about that there is no evidence to support that God exists or that He cares. >
Well, the whole conversation about “evidence” comes from the fact that you, and only you, have used the word “evidence”. You, and only you, assert here that God’s existence is certain because of evidences.
So the conversation was NOT about that there is NO evidence to support God’s existence (as you wrote in your latest post), but about that there IS evidence to support God’s existence. Just because that is YOUR assertion. And everybody wants to know what are those evidences.
My point is that invoking evidences about God’s existence is the worst angle of discussion. This whole thread is an evidence of my point…