Dear Chyron8472,
I have trouble reconciling these two angles of your speech :
- Sometimes, you say that your opinion is not irrefutable :
Okay. But to be clear, I do not say that I know better than you (at least no more than you might say you know better than me).
I do not say my position is superior.
You said that I expect people to take my testimony as objective fact:
I’d appreciate not being expected to think of your personal experiences as objective fact for everyone to take seriously.
I don’t expect that.
- But most of the time, you say that your opinion is irrefutable :
That would be healthy if there was no God, but there is.
Yes there is. I’ve had personal experiences that prove it beyond the shadow of the remotest possible doubt.
There is evidence.
God literally created time and space. There was no “beginning” before the beginning because before the beginning there was no time. As our universe expands, so does the boundaries of the space-time continuum. God created it. Therefore, he does not have to exist within it.
IMHO, talking about God and his faith requires enormous humility, and your way of asserting certain things is sorely lacking of humility. It deserves your message, and it seems to me that you do not understand that your “opponents” are not opposed to the idea of God, but to your way of imposing your point of view without nuances.