logo Sign In

Random Thoughts — Page 700

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Possessed said:

TV’s Frink said:

suspiciouscoffee said:

Test.

Edit: test.

Edit 2: Possessed is right.

I can see your edit.

JEDIT: And this one.

I think you misunderstand. We are saying you can’t see that a post was edited. Like there’s no link that says “this post has been edited” like before that shows you when and potentially why something was edited

I think you misunderstand, because I definitely can see links that say the posts have been edited.

suspiciouscoffee
Time
10-Apr-2018 4:57 PM — Edited 10-Apr-2018 4:57 PM

No it’s a mobile thing. If I switch to desktop view on my phone I can see the edits again.

Author
Time

dahmage said:

TV’s Frink said:

Possessed said:

TV’s Frink said:

suspiciouscoffee said:

Test.

Edit: test.

Edit 2: Possessed is right.

I can see your edit.

JEDIT: And this one.

I think you misunderstand. We are saying you can’t see that a post was edited. Like there’s no link that says “this post has been edited” like before that shows you when and potentially why something was edited

I think you misunderstand, because I definitely can see links that say the posts have been edited.

suspiciouscoffee
Time
10-Apr-2018 4:57 PM — Edited 10-Apr-2018 4:57 PM

No it’s a mobile thing. If I switch to desktop view on my phone I can see the edits again.

I think he misunderstood that I misunderstood.

Author
Time

I think we can all safely agree that dahmage is misunderstanding something as we speak.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

dahmage said:

TV’s Frink said:

Possessed said:

TV’s Frink said:

suspiciouscoffee said:

Test.

Edit: test.

Edit 2: Possessed is right.

I can see your edit.

JEDIT: And this one.

I think you misunderstand. We are saying you can’t see that a post was edited. Like there’s no link that says “this post has been edited” like before that shows you when and potentially why something was edited

I think you misunderstand, because I definitely can see links that say the posts have been edited.

suspiciouscoffee
Time
10-Apr-2018 4:57 PM — Edited 10-Apr-2018 4:57 PM

No it’s a mobile thing. If I switch to desktop view on my phone I can see the edits again.

I think he misunderstood that I misunderstood.

Miss, I understand

Author
Time

Possessed said:

I think we can all safely agree that dahmage is misunderstanding something as we speak.

Very flattering, but I’m happily married.

Author
Time

Is it weird that I don’t particularly feel any more excited for Avengers: Infinity War than any given Marvel solo film?

Author
Time

suspiciouscoffee said:

Nope, sounds perfectly normal.

Just odd that there’s this hype on the internet about “ten years in the making” as if we haven’t seen most of these characters crossover already.

Author
Time

I haven’t been excited for a Marvel film since… probably the original Avengers. I’m a bit interested in this one because it’s a similar situation to the first. No one knew how they’d be able to pull off having so many characters in the first movie, which seems quaint now, and this one feels the same way. I haven’t seen a cast so big since It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

The fact that the cast is so big is interesting to me, but in my mind it’s not something that makes me think the film will be good. To me it’s really a question of “will having this many characters hurt the film or not?”

The novelty isn’t nearly the same as it was for the first Avengers. There it was the excitement of seeing heroes team up for the first time. This is just… more heroes teaming up?

Author
Time

Yeah, I agree. It’s more a matter of if it will work instead of whether or not it will be good.

Author
Time

Like, last year I had around 400 posts, despite being around for maybe three more years. Now I have nearly 3000 posts. Weird.