I was just stating an opinion, an unwanted one it seems, but an opinion nonetheless. and unlike the rest of you, I have refrained from making personal insults. Who is better, the person who answers a question or the person who jumps on the responder? The latter because name callers and shamers are not what one should aspire to be. I’m a secular humanist Jew and even I can see that there is no value to be found in the books of either religion when it comes to morality. The fact that you’re all up in arms over my suggestion to the poster proves to me that some people can’t play nice.
when the words used are actually descriptions of someone’s behavior rather than a juvenile insult, it isn’t simply “name calling.”
You mocked religious beliefs when the context of the thread and the conversation therein had nothing to do with religion. This is not an unwanted opinion, it is an insult being spread to anyone who is religiously a Jew or a Christian. We are not “name callers and shamers” because we called you out for being an asshole.
If someone on here made a blatantly racist comment, would I be a name calling shamer for calling them a racist?
You’re playing the victim card and I’m not buying it.
Yep.
Zerome, what you said was inconsiderate and immature (at best). That’s not me name calling, that’s just how it is. Hopefully this won’t take up ten more pages.
Yep.
You did mean to mock them. Your statement about “the fictional bible of the Jews and Christians” was very directly mocking the books as well as those who hold related religious beliefs, and there’s no way you can victim-card your way out of it.
I say again:
If someone on here made a blatantly racist comment, would I be a name calling shamer for calling them a racist?
I’m not playing any cards. I’m not mocking just giving my opinion.
Yeah, you are. You’re playing the same snide passive-aggressive cards ImpScum used to play. You’re fooling absolutely no one.
Yep.