Engaging - if one wishes to - Peterson on his own terms is the best way to argue, not falling into the “so what you’re saying is…” trap.
Engaging a piece of shit like that guy is giving him too much credit.
Even besides him being a piece of shit, there’s no reason to engage him because everything he says is pseudo-philosophical word salad that is impossible to address because it ultimately has no real meaning. It’s just babble with a bunch of buzzwords mixed in. It amazes me how the right will complain about how evil academics are because they’re usually liberal, but then the second they get some slippery academic to agree with them, they love him and tout him as the authority on all things.