I know how MPEG2 works, I just wanted to confirm whether you thought it looked any different on this new version between the capture and the encode, as people have been asking over in my thread wether it is fair to compare capture screenshots to screenshots pulled from a finished DVD. In my opinion if done well, the difference is so minimal as to be negligible - I just wanted to make sure you agreed before I put up any other screenshots.
I'll take it as a no, I didn't see any difference. ;^)

Another question (I'll risk the bag of poo arriving in the post), are the screenshots TR47 posted recently accurate to what is on the disc (i.e. his editing to put them all together hasn't made them noticably worse or anything)