If you think this kid only killed people because he had a gun
Add the word “seventeen” and you’re on to something. Harm reduction is the concept behind the whole thing. The only one actually fighting against evil is Batman.
Maybe you misunderstood, I will rephrase: If you think he was only able to kill people because he had a gun…
As for harm reduction, a gun ban is unrealistic and sacrifices basic liberties (whether you think those liberties are outmoded or rarely needed). It’s like the ‘free range’ parenting topic, where charging parents with negligence is about harm reduction.
What if we could put a virtual end to school shootings without a gun ban? Do we even want to try that?