I’m in high school. I have many wonderful teachers. I don’t think any of them should be armed. Some of my teachers, and again, I love them, can hardly even operate a DVD player. I do not want any of them to be given firearms.
What about police officers that are extremely well trained and especially for a school environment and whom had been extremely background checked?
https://twitter.com/markpopham/status/964157761427787777
Every time another one of these mass shootings happen - right when the Republicans start telling us that the answer is more guns, guns for everyone, guns for teachers, guns for students - I think about Chris Kyle.
https://twitter.com/markpopham/status/964157915056803840
Chris Kyle was the American Sniper guy - a highly decorated Navy Seal sniper with 150 confirmed kills in the Iraq War. Whatever else is true about him, he definitely was very good at shooting guns and used to being in combat environments.
https://twitter.com/markpopham/status/964158367697723392
Kyle knew that the man he was with was dangerous. He knew he was armed - he armed him! To the degree that anyone could be forewarned and prepared for a situation, Kyle was. And yet the other guy shot two armed and trained men dead, got in a car and drove away.
https://twitter.com/markpopham/status/964158835043774470
Today a bunch of men are going to go to a gun store and they’re going to buy their third or 10th or 25th gun, because this scares them, and they think the gun is going to keep them safe.
You tell me in which scenario does a nut with gun have a better can at killing a lot of people.
- Going into a school where no one is armed.
- Going into a police station full of armed cops.
Or instead of hypotheticals, let’s use real numbers:
But that’s in hospitals. Maybe schools are different.
Maybe these security officers need better training and maybe they need holsters better designed to prevent a perp from doing that.
Honestly the way some of you are talking, it is a wonder you don’t post that you think cops should no longer carry guns. Maybe the military as well.
Yeah I’m not crazy about the fact that cops have the ability to kill people. That’s something that needs fixing.
First of all, I don’t believe in the death penalty, and that’s after due process. So I certainly don’t think a cop should have that power.
So you don’t think a cop should have the ability to defend himself/herself. Got it. ok. I am not going waste my time engaging you on such stupidity.
We manage just fine in the UK without letting our Police execute members of the public
the UK isn’t the US. Many more badguys are armed here.
execute is not the same as defense.
(specialist fire-arms officers aside).
wait, you have them, why? Why should they get to execute members of the public? No one should have that right, correct?
-
yhwx answered this one very well above.
-
In what way is it different in a practical application? If you give the Police free reign to execute people they feel threatened by, they will use it in many cases. They are Police, so they encounter threatening people all day, it’s their (difficult) job. If our Police encounter somebody who has a gun, or could possibly have a gun (which is incredibly unlikely in the UK) they can call in specialist firearms backup as a last resort. Making the ultimate and final punishment available as the first response to a pressure situation is playing with public safety (I’m also against the deathly-penalty by the way).
-
See answer to 2. Also UK fire-arms Police do not “have that right” to execute people in the way you’d compare it to US Police. If they use lethal force they have to be able to justify it in a court of law. A world away from “He looked at me funny”, or “He reached into his glove box, so I executed him on the spot just in case he was going to do something” no questions asked.