- Time
- Post link
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
This topic has been locked by a moderator.
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
How about no one until we have proof?
but then i wouldn’t have to believe them. or do we have to believe facts now for them to be true. /sarcasm
huh?
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
You can’t believe anything either of them say. Proof is irrelevant.
How about no one until we have proof?
let me rephrase this.
How about we neither believe either of them is telling the true until we have proof, and either of them is lying until we have proof?
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
You can’t believe anything either of them say. Proof is irrelevant.
How could proof be irrelevant?
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
It’s like the two doors puzzle, where one door always tells the truth, and the other door always tells lies. Except both doors always tell lies.
You can’t believe anything either of those people say.
Proof was irrelevant to my point.
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
It’s like the two doors puzzle, where one door always tells the truth, and the other door always tells lies. Except both doors always tell lies.
if that were the case, I would just have to believe the opposite of what either tells me.
You can’t believe anything either of those people say.
Proof was irrelevant to my point.
Maybe you are right and I shouldn’t believe anything either says, but if they have proof that what they say it true, solid proof, what then?
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
It’s like the two doors puzzle, where one door always tells the truth, and the other door always tells lies. Except both doors always tell lies.
Those guys will drive you nuts, and you end up in a oubliette anyway. 😉
Where were you in '77?
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
It’s like the two doors puzzle, where one door always tells the truth, and the other door always tells lies. Except both doors always tell lies.
Haha exactly.
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
It’s like the two doors puzzle, where one door always tells the truth, and the other door always tells lies. Except both doors always tell lies.
if that were the case, I would just have to believe the opposite of what either tells me.
I think Frink’s point was drama for drama’s sake, or something to that effect (maybe). Which person is to be believed is irrelevant because neither one is credible enough to warrant believing. Whether one or the other is telling the truth speaks nothing to their current credibility.
I think. I don’t really care who they are nor do I have any interest in who is credible or why anyone ought to take sides.
chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
It’s like the two doors puzzle, where one door always tells the truth, and the other door always tells lies. Except both doors always tell lies.
if that were the case, I would just have to believe the opposite of what either tells me.
I think Frink’s point was drama for drama’s sake, or something to that effect (maybe). Which person is to be believed is irrelevant because neither one is credible enough to warrant believing. Whether one or the other is telling the truth speaks nothing to their current credibility.
This.
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
It’s like the two doors puzzle, where one door always tells the truth, and the other door always tells lies. Except both doors always tell lies.
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
It’s like the two doors puzzle, where one door always tells the truth, and the other door always tells lies. Except both doors always tell lies.
Those guys will drive you nuts, and you end up in a oubliette anyway. 😉
Going through the oubliette was actually the correct way out. It’s just the door was hidden.
chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
It’s like the two doors puzzle, where one door always tells the truth, and the other door always tells lies. Except both doors always tell lies.
😄
How about no one until we have proof?
You’ve missed the point.
which is?
It’s like the two doors puzzle, where one door always tells the truth, and the other door always tells lies. Except both doors always tell lies.
Those guys will drive you nuts, and you end up in a oubliette anyway. 😉Going through the oubliette was actually the correct way out. It’s just the door was hidden.
Which is why that dwarf who works for David Bowie is worth bribing. 😉
Where were you in '77?
I don’t think anyone is that desperate to win a reality show. Morgan hates Star Wars, so nuts to him anyway. 😛
I thought reality shows are based on shameless desperation.
The blue elephant in the room.
I don’t think anyone is that desperate to win a reality show. Morgan hates Star Wars, so nuts to him anyway. 😛
I thought reality shows are based on shameless desperation.
It would be nice if reality shows were actually based on reality.
I don’t think anyone is that desperate to win a reality show. Morgan hates Star Wars, so nuts to him anyway. 😛
I thought reality shows are based on shameless desperation.
It would be nice if reality shows were actually based on reality.
Those are known as “documentaries.”
I don’t think anyone is that desperate to win a reality show. Morgan hates Star Wars, so nuts to him anyway. 😛
I thought reality shows are based on shameless desperation.
It would be nice if reality shows were actually based on reality.
Those are known as “documentaries.”
Marlin Perkins allegedly had a foot in both worlds.
I’d quote a section of the article, but the entire thing is so insane that I can’t pick just one part.
I’d quote a section of the article, but the entire thing is so insane that I can’t pick just one part.
Aside from the officers going to the wrong house tragically ending in death there’s not enough information to know if the officers acted wrongly. The family’s lawyer says he didn’t have a gun. Officers say he did. We’ll see what an investigation/lawsuit turns up.
The blue elephant in the room.
We’ll see what an investigation/lawsuit turns up.
no,no,no,no,no,no. We don’t wait for investigations and evidence and trials anymore. The cops are guilty. They are murderers and they shot the guy because they hate his race. We all know it, we don’t need any investigation or evidence or trial! Benefit of the doubt/reasonable doubt don’t matter anymore.
We’ll see what an investigation/lawsuit turns up.
no,no,no,no,no,no. We don’t wait for investigations and evidence and trials anymore. The cops are guilty. They murders and they shoot the guy because they hate his race. We all know it, we don’t need any investigation or evidence or trial! Benefit of the doubt/reasonable doubt don’t matter anymore.
lol