logo Sign In

Episode VIII : The Last Jedi - Discussion * SPOILER THREAD * — Page 110

Author
Time

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

If hyperspace is a fifth dimension, why would Han to worry about flying into a star are too close to a supernova?

This is why official canon is dumb. Just go by what you see on the screen.

Well, for what it’s worth, Starwars.com provides this explanation:

“Hyperdrives allow starships to travel faster than the speed of light, crossing space through the alternate dimension of hyperspace. Large objects in normal space cast “mass shadows” in hyperspace, so hyperspace jumps must be precisely calculated to avoid collisions.”

Author
Time

Collipso said:

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

Cool. I’m sure that’s what George was thinking when he wrote ANH.

This was the best answer you could’ve possibly given.

I think a lot of the hyperspace complication has to do with justifying quick travel across distances of multiple light years. But for God sake, they call it light speed in the movies. I find the scientific inaccuracies charming. Star Wars isn’t PBS NOVA.

TV’s Frink said:

I would put this in my sig if I weren’t so lazy.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

Collipso said:

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

Cool. I’m sure that’s what George was thinking when he wrote ANH.

This was the best answer you could’ve possibly given.

I think a lot of the hyperspace complication has to do with justifying quick travel across distances of multiple light years. But for God sake, they call it light speed in the movies. I find the scientific inaccuracies charming. Star Wars isn’t PBS NOVA.

+1

Author
Time

Technobabble doesn’t belong in a fantasy movie.

Author
Time

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

If hyperspace is a fifth dimension, why would Han to worry about flying into a star are too close to a supernova?

This is why official canon is dumb. Just go by what you see on the screen.

I agree with this

Author
Time

I do wonder why Hyperspace collisions don’t happen more often though.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

This is when someone posts a Wookipedia article about the famous Trandoshan hyperspace paramedic Babo-Rutiss and his long days of sifting through the remains of supernova related accidents.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I’m a SW/TESB only fan, so as I suspected, I didn’t like TLJ (in fact, I disliked it more than TFA and R1). However, I have different reasons to dislike TLJ. Just like Jar-Jar Binks and the Ewoks weren’t the biggest problems of TPM and RotJ, the “big” issues fans have with TLJ are, at best, minor problems that could have been easily fixed. Even Rey’s Force powers (which I also complained when TFA was released, although her gender was never an issue for me, as I also hate the cartoonish Jedi from the prequells) aren’t a problem here (in fact, her skills are more believable in TLJ, although all the Force users of TLJ are way too powerful. And yes, I include Luke and Yoda here).

The biggest problem with TLJ is that is a giant mess of a movie for several reasons, including (wall of text incoming):
-The casino planet scenes (which made me remember the prequels) was a huge low point. “Comedy” scenes included.

-The lack of character development, or even proper introductions, for most of the cast; see Rose, who needs to explain Finn and the audience what kind of character she is because the movie won’t allow her to be defined by her own personality and actions. Think about Amilyn Holdo. If you haven’t read Gray’s “Leia: Princess of Alderaan”, what kind of information about Holdo you got from TLJ? Almost nothing other than being Leia’s friend and a military leader. Her scene with Leia and her sacrifice hints at an interesting character, but she’s only there… doing stuff in the background… I guess. She had as much development as Piett ever had (and Piett was just an Imperial officer doing his job, merely someone who follows Vader’s orders). This overflow of characters means some of them disappears and reappears when the script demands so, or they remain the whole time but they doen’t have an impact in the plot at all. Here’s an example: the betrayal from Del Toro’s character has less impact and consequences that Boba Fett’s presence in TESB, because the final battle from TLJ is just a temporal, annoying obstacle (yes, some Resistance people die, and Luke dies too, but honestly if TLJ’s ending were different, that last thing would have happened too as soon as Luke faced Kylo Ren in IX); whereas without Boba Fett, the last third of TESB would have been completely different. Replace Del Toro with the Imperial probe droid from the beginning of Empire and you’ll have the same movie (heck, why does the FO need such a character to find out the Resistance’s plans? Even if the planet was unknown and uncharted, didn’t they realize the planet they can see from their own windows could be a perfect hiding place?). And yet Del Toro was given more screen time and dialogue than Boba, hinting at a bigger, more important character than the one we got (and yes, I used Boba Fett as an example because Boba is a very minor character with an extremely huge fanbase for no reason; that such a slightly disappointing character with little screen time and dialogue in Empire is way more relevant that Del Toro’s character shows Johnson’s writing skills). And the same can be said about Finn or Rose or even Rey. I don’t know who posted this TFA/R1 review on this forum before, but the criticisms made in this video applies to TLJ as well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsIQa7sH5_Y

-The extremely improbable story that doesn’t make any damn sense and feels like it was written by a five year old kid (and then X appears, and then a battle, and then Y happens, and then betrayal, and then an action scene, and then another plot twist, and then Z appears, and then another surprise, and then A dies, and then…). I strongly suspect they can’t no longer make simple Star Wars movies with simple stories like SW (kid goes to a larger than life story, enjoyable stuff happens, the end) or Empire (Vader wants Luke, Luke is training, Leia and Han are in love, the end) because it would be “too boring” and “slow” now. Now you need like five or six stories happening on a 24-hour period, crossing and splitting from each other several times in the movie. TFA was a poor rehash of SW and it was poorly written, but at least it had a relatively simple “Star Wars-y” story. TLJ is a bunch of stuff put together and thrown to the audience. When the movie says Kylo Ren is gonna kill Snoke (the supposely big bad of the sequel trilogy and a character who was given importance in TFA and the earlier scenes of TLJ), I felt like absolutely anything, ANYTHING, could happen. Like, as I said, a story written by a five year old. I don’t expect extremely predictable stories, I like surprises too, but no plot twist every five minutes please.

-No sense of pacing at all. The first battle scene feels like it belong to the middle of the movie. The action is way out of control. But honestly, this is a problem since the prequels. There were parts in TPM (like the podracing scenes) that were too intense for me, but it has gotten way worse over the years. I don’t expect OT-like effects but I don’t understand why every explosion must happen that close to the camera, or why the camera must be moving every two seconds (even when a character is still), or why there must be bazillion CGI particles in every space scene. The OT prefers static cameras and moving starfields and ships (because that’s the best they could do in the eighties). When RotJ has space scenes with the camera tracking/following the fighters, at least it has good reasons to do it (to give the battle of Endor a 3D feeling, because it’s the last movie of the trilogy, because it’s a way bigger event than the battle of Yavin IV and Hoth). When the post-1983 movies do the same, it’s because it’s simple routine. I think this is a mistake, I think an action movie should give more visual information when the scene really demands it.

-The villains aren’t that great. Another problem since RotJ: only in SW and Empire the villains are in (almost) full control of the situation. In this aspect, TLJ is nowhere as bad as TFA, R1 or the prequels, but it’s still a far cry from the Vader who didn’t succeed because he couldn’t predict Artoo would be told about the sabotage of the Falcon by the main computer of Cloud City, or the Tarkin and Vader who allowed the heroes to escape the Death Star. Honestly, I just don’t like Kylo Ren and Hux. And I don’t like this “a villain can be redeemed” crap.

-The comedy is really bad. A few of the comedy bits are better than TFA/R1, but they’re still based on “bizarre stuff happening” and “people delivering punchlines that any other character could deliver too”. SW/TESB weren’t like that, the comedy in those movies came from the characters being themselves and the audience realizing the tropes behind those characters.

Short story: I think TLJ is watchable, but I don’t find it rewatchable.

Author
Time

Adding a CR after each point would really help with that text wall.

Author
Time

Sorry about the lack of spaces, I edited it. Thanks.

Author
Time

And to add to my previous comment, the only positive thing I can say about TLJ is that it’s the best Star Wars movie when it comes to female characters. And yet it was very disappointing in that aspect.

Author
Time

GZK8000 said:

And to add to my previous comment, the only positive thing I can say about TLJ is that it’s the best Star Wars movie when it comes to female characters. And yet it was very disappointing in that aspect.

Disagree with everything except for this comment, what you said about pacing and what you said about the jokes.

Author
Time

Why does the first battle scene seem like it belongs in the middle of the movie?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

GZK8000 said:

I’m a SW/TESB only fan, so as I suspected, I didn’t like TLJ.

I don’t see the relevance here. Before Disney took over, I would have described me mainly as a SW/ESB fan, but now I think TLJ is the third best SW movie.

Ceci n’est pas une signature.

Author
Time

Because they didn’t show how Luke got from ESB to TLJ, come on Frank.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV’s Frink said:

Why does the first battle scene seem like it belongs in the middle of the movie?

I do think that starting the movie with such an intense action scene is, I dunno… wrong. Like, I don’t mind an action scene (SW starts with the Tantive IV and the Devastator), heck RotJ has a rather boring opening scene (is too long and it takes a lof for Vader’s shuttle to reach the Death Star), but these later movies are so intense I can’t really enjoy them. There’s so much action my body can handle, and the non-stop cameras, the quick transitions/cuts, and the overly loud OST is too much for me. It’s a matter of personal preference, but I don’t really think the movie should go from 0 to 100 that fast.

Also, it’s a rather generic battle scene. Allow me to explain:

Frank your Majesty said:

I don’t see the relevance here. Before Disney took over, I would have described me mainly as a SW/ESB fan, but now I think TLJ is the third best SW movie.

The reason why I thought this bit was relevant is because I do think many of the problems I have with the later movies (and I include TLJ here) started in RotJ or TPM (usually RotJ, but things like the RBG lightsaber scheme are from TPM). The weak villains, for example, because while SW and TESB had pretty great villains, in RotJ the Empire is restricted to Endor, Vader (who is much weaker here) never sent an Imperial agent to Jabba’s Palace (…because… ?) and the Emperor’s plan never made a lot of sense; I don’t think Krennic, Tarkin and Vader were great in R1 (I don’t really understand Tarkin’s actions, honestly, I know he’s overconfident and wants to humiliate Krennic but why is he holding critical information to Krennic about Galen Erso?), the First Order is pretty clueless in TFA, and the prequels… are the prequels. Or the rather non-sensical plots and illogically designed sets. Or the generic battle scenes. And many other things.

What do I mean by “generic battle scenes”. Well, both the Battle of Yavin IV and the Battle of Hoth had something in common: they’re based on a single but powerful visual element. In SW’s case, it’s the trench (yes, there’s some dogfighting before, but most of the battle happens in the trench), and wow I can feel the tension every time I watch the climax (and I don’t know how many times I have watched the climax), while in TESB it’s the AT-ATs themselves, a design the movie exploits in four enjoyable ways (the snowspeeder passing through an AT-AT’s legs, an AT-AT destroying Luke’s snowspeeder, Luke cutting the belly of an AT-AT, Wedge taking down an AT-AT with an harpoon cable). The AT-ATs are extremely memorable here, and how many parodies of the trench run has been made in these four decades?

But from RotJ onwards, the battles in Star Wars are almost limited to “a bunch of units put together”. The Battle of Endor? A Rebel fleet versus an Imperial fleet, with a Death Star in the background. The space Battle of Naboo? Naboo spaceships versus the Trade Federation space station. The Battle of Coruscant? The Battle of Geonosis? Same thing, some units here and some units there, chaos ensures. The Battle of Scarif has more potential, because like the ground battle of Naboo is based on an energy shield preventing a side to attack the other side, but in both cases they’re bypassed (early in TPM, it takes time in R1 and the solution is… too ridiculous/much for me).

The early battle in TLJ, although different from many other battles in Star Wars (it takes the idea of the Rebels destroying the turbolasers of the Death Star but it adds a bombing run), is just that: a battle. There’s no visual element/form that is truly memorable here, no central idea, nothing in the battle that really stands out and makes me say “oh wow I want to rewatch this battle over and over and over”. It may be better than a typical battle from a Marvel movie (but then again I don’t like the Marvel movies I have seen), but there’s nothing really deep going on. My general thoughts on this matter is that they feel that by adding some sacrifices and lots of special effects you have the job done. That wasn’t the case with the Battle of Hoth, for example, because they didn’t have the resources we have now, so they put a lot of time into making the whole battle truly memorable. I don’t hate CGI (it’s another resource, like matte paintings or models), there’s lot of great ways to use CGI, I just hate using CGI in such a lazy, unmemorable way.

But “generic battle scenes” isn’t my biggest gripe with TLJ. It’s just an example of my theory of how the post-1980 movies repeat the same problems over and over. Sometimes they may avoid or kinda fix some problems (I’m still not sure if I would put R1 above RotJ but I agree it’s much better than the other post-RotJ movies), but I don’t see a tendency here (other than the Disney movies not being as bad as the prequels, but that’s rather easy). Hope you understand now what I mean by “I’m a SW/TESB only fan so as I predicted I disliked TLJ”.

Oh, and based on my explanation, the opening scene of SW would be “generic”. But I don’t really consider it a battle scene (because the Tantive IV is disabled in a few seconds, and the rest is about people firing to each other and the droids escaping), just an action scene. Also, SW is the most lightweight Star Wars movie. There are a lot of parts in SW that are kinda silly, but that’s what the movie is about, so I don’t mind (I don’t use the seriousness of TESB and the later movies to criticise SW). TLJ, on the other hand, it’s probably the most serious Star Wars movie since RotS (more than R1 in a lot of parts), so my analysis and reactions cannot be the same.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Faster, more intense. -George Lucas

Also, I can’t see how the opening battle with the bombers can be seen as generic. It evokes WWII combat footage of B-17 bombers.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

SilverWook said:

Faster, more intense. -George Lucas

There’s nothing wrong with making things a little more intense than in earlier movies. TESB has some scenes that are more “intense” and dramatic than the action scenes from SW, like the Falcon nearly succeeding into letting three Star Destroyers to crash with each others or Luke’s rescue from the bottom of Cloud City. That may have been something amazing in 1980, but now it’s rather mundane compared with the crap you have in the prequels, for example. At some points things become too big, too epic and too dramatic, and these movies crossed my personal line a long time ago.

SilverWook said:

Also, I can’t see how the opening battle with the bombers can be seen as generic. It evokes WWII combat footage of B-17 bombers.

I found it way worse than the dogfighting scenes after the escape from the Death Star. That also evoked WWII combat footage, but it’s based on a critical idea: that the heroes (and the audience) cannot see the TIE Fighters all the time, we can only hear them and they are hard to hit. The early battle during the evacuation of D’Qar is rather forgettable in comparison.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

GZK8000 said:

SilverWook said:

Faster, more intense. -George Lucas

There’s nothing wrong with making things a little more intense than in earlier movies. TESB has some scenes that are more “intense” and dramatic than the action scenes from SW, like the Falcon nearly succeeding into letting three Star Destroyers to crash with each others or Luke’s rescue from the bottom of Cloud City. That may have been something amazing in 1980, but now it’s rather mundane compared with the crap you have in the prequels, for example. At some points things become too big, too epic and too dramatic, and these movies crossed my personal line a long time ago.

I sort of agree. I’ll watch a CGI “dense” movie like Avatar and enjoy it. Same with the Marvel movies and whatever else.
But there’s something about a movie that is slow-paced, and works on building a sense of wonder, instead of forcing it on you with spectacle.
I wouldn’t even argue that the OT fits the definition of that kind of movie. But because it flirted with those aspects, that’s why it has staying power, it least for me. Maybe others are different.

Author
Time

The OT was specifically designed to not be slow paced or spend to much time showing the scenery. Lucas said himself that he didn’t want to linger on the alien landscapes and crazy special effects more than necessary. He wanted audiences to take it for granted, as if they lived in the galaxy all their life. And those films are only (relatively) slower paced in retrospect.

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

The OT was specifically designed to not be slow paced or spend to much time showing the scenery. Lucas said himself that he didn’t want to linger on the alien landscapes and crazy special effects more than necessary. He wanted audiences to take it for granted, as if they lived in the galaxy all their life. And those films are only (relatively) slower paced in retrospect.

Exactly. It’s really funny, last year I watched Star Wars with my dad and he said “oh god! Such a fast paced movie! Hahaha” (he’s 73). I then went on to watch Star Wars again with a friend of mine, and after the movie was over she said “well… that was a bit slow, wasn’t it?” (she’s 18).