I still am under no obligation to like it.
You’re also under no obligation to steal Ric Olie’s thunder, and yet here you are.
If art is subjective, and I already said my opinion of the film was subjective, why then do you guys feel obligated to contradict me or say my preferences are in bad taste? Apparently having to defend my position is not a Captain Obvious move if people are telling me my initial reasoning is flawed.
But you gave nonsense reasons as to why you didn’t like it. Saying the movie is bad because you don’t know the name of a character for 20-something minutes is absurd.
First, I did initially just only say I hated it. And from my perspective, it’s absurd that I can’t give my own personal reasons why I subjectively didn’t like it and not be told that my reasons are absurd. I wasn’t expecting it to be bad. I wasn’t grasping at straws to hate it. I just remember walking out of the theatre after it was over and ticking off the things I didn’t like about it, and the reasons I gave now were those things. They’re not nonsense to me, and you don’t have to agree, but I feel the reaction to my talking about it, (eg. saying my opinion is nonsense or absurd) is stronger in tone than is warranted.
In other words, you tell me that I could just say “It’s not for me” and leave it at that; but conversely when I give my opinion, you could just say you don’t agree and also leave it at that. So maybe I did too easily take offense, I’ll admit that. But I don’t feel blame falls solely on my own shoulders.
Took me a while to realize you aren’t talking about wonder woman…