I still am under no obligation to like it.
You’re also under no obligation to steal Ric Olie’s thunder, and yet here you are.
If art is subjective, and I already said my opinion of the film was subjective, why then do you guys feel obligated to contradict me or say my preferences are in bad taste? Apparently having to defend my position is not a Captain Obvious move if people are telling me my initial reasoning is flawed.
You can say you don’t like a film, you have that right. But you gave nonsense reasons as to why you didn’t like it. Don’t be surprised when you do that, you’ll have someone counter points you make. Better for you to just say it wasn’t for you and leave it at that. But saying the movie is bad because you don’t know the name of a character for 20-something minutes is absurd. But go on and play the victim some more. I don’t understand why you post at all when you take offense to any sort of discussion it generates.