Sign In

Post #1156225

Parent topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Link to post in topic
Date created
9-Jan-2018, 4:01 PM

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

I’m not attacking you, I’m attacking your position. Which is wrong. But ok.


Invalidating peoples’ opinions won’t make you any friends. Stop treating me like this. Stop attacking me and telling me I’m wrong. Just stop. You’re being rude and childish.

And don’t you dare condescend to me just because I use a media server or watch cartoons.

How am I attacking you?

You are being condescending, invalidating and rude.

Here is the definition for “invalidate:”

make (an argument, statement, or theory) unsound or erroneous.

That’s perfectly within normal decorum of this forum. As for the other two, yes, there is more of a case to be made for those.

You don’t know politics, polling, or probability very well, as evidenced by your posts.

You can let me have my opinion that Oprah doesn’t stand a chance without attacking me. You don’t have to turn it into a debate over statistics. You don’t have to say my opinion takes a Trumpian view or accuse me of only being willing to talk to an echo chamber. You can be polite to people on these forums.

Well, your saying that Oprah stands no chance would have probably invited some discussion about probabilities and stuff. Your statement is just factually incorrect. Oprah stands way more of a chance than Lincoln Chaffee.