It seems funny that people are claiming TLJ is riddled with a feminism agenda driven by Kathleen Kennedy and now RT and YouTube scores are mostly from young males?
How is that funny? Who is mostly likely to complain about a “feminism agenda driven by Kathleen Kennedy,” or even believe it exists in the first place?
Hint: It’s not Grandma Bessie.
Use of “funny” in that way is just another way of saying “weird”.
Yes I know. I’m using it the same way you are.
It seems weird that suddenly it’s not just a small subset of the audience, now it’s a “mostly young male” subset and the assumption and generalisation is made that they will automatically bad mouth the movie because they think it is feminist propaganda.
No one is saying young males will automatically bad mouth a movie for being feminist propaganda. But the most likely people to bad mouth any movie for being feminist propaganda are young males. I don’t know how you can possibly argue otherwise.
In arguments trying to invalidate negative scores, “mostly young males” is now the next excuse in line to be thrown up as to why these scores for some reason have to be incorrect.
No, the reason the scores (as a whole, not individually) can possibly be invalidated is because of demographics, and there’s no way for any of us to know since RT doesn’t control for it. Therefore it’s worthless. It doesn’t account for who is voting, and it doesn’t account for why they’re voting. It doesn’t mean people didn’t hate the movie, or more people hated than loved, it just means we have no way of knowing which is closer to the truth. So using the score to prove anything is pointless.