So even though he ultimately decided the scene didn’t work and changed the film accordingly, you’re still upset at him for having the idea in the first place? I’m sorry, but that’s pretty weak.
I think your powers of comprehension and deduction are pretty weak. It’s pretty obvious in both the initial post you replied to and the below one that he is not just talking about that one deleted scene.
DrDre said:
Yes, but it betrays RJ’s feelings and intentions going into this. So, he’s taken off some of the sharper edges, but he still turned the Jedi’s 1000 generation legacy of peace and justice, and the OT’s theme of hope and redemption into a legacy of failure for both the Jedi and Luke personally. It’s more revisionist than Lucas has ever done.I think your powers of being able to engage in a civil discussion without acting rude and immature are pretty weak.
Says the one that admits to being snarky whenever they reply.
I’m happy to maintain a civil discussion while it remains civil. I’m also not afraid to give back what I receive though if I think they’ve overstepped one to many times.
In this case it was not directed at me but I felt Joefavs’s reply was pretty disingenuous in the face of what DrDre’s post was actually saying and wanted to point this out. He’s free to correct himself if he wants.
.Val