So even though he ultimately decided the scene didn’t work and changed the film accordingly, you’re still upset at him for having the idea in the first place? I’m sorry, but that’s pretty weak.
No it’s not. Cut content still speaks to the mindset of the writer of the story.
I firmly believe anything that doesn’t make the final movie isn’t admissible in this kind of argument, however interesting it may be. Otherwise, Indiana Jones is a statutory rapist.