logo Sign In

The Last Jedi: Official Review and Opinions Thread ** SPOILERS ** — Page 29

Author
Time

dahmage said:

DrDre said:

Collipso said:

DrDre said:

Matt.F said:

Dre, you’re trying to say that Snoke not being able to read Rey’s mind whilst she’s on Jedi Island is a plothole?!

You’re frustratingly inconsistent. One minute you’re arguing a case that Force users need to be geographically near each other to telepathically commune. The next you’re saying that Poe having his mind read during interrogation by Kylo isn’t canon, and only Force Users can read other Force Users minds - even when you’ve been shown to be wrong about that.

No, I’m very consistent. I’m stating:

  1. In the OT the Force users originally (at least up till 1983) needed to be geographically near each other to telepathically commune.

  2. There’s no evidence in the OT itself, that Force users can read non-Force users minds. This has to be inferred from EU material and movies released after the OT.

  3. The Jedi mind probe is a retcon, that was subsequently prominently featured in TFA. I have no problem with this.

  4. The ST changes the rules by allowing Force users to telepathically commune over much larger distances. I have no problem with this either.

  5. That TLJ applies the ST rules inconsistently. This is a problem for me.

The truth is you’ve devised some personal ‘rule system’ for how force powers work, it ignores actual canon and makes sense to no one but yourself, but you cant seem to grasp that.

I don’t ignore canon, but I also don’t ignore how these powers were first introduced to the audience, starting in 1977.

The truth is we are shown new Force powers on pretty much a movie by movie basis. If you’re going to be adamant and say that only the Force powers you saw in ANH in 1977 are valid and all the rest are bogus then you’re going to be disappointed by every new Star Wars movie that comes out, because I guarantee the Force will evolve in every episode because audiences thrive on ‘the new’. The force powers shown in The Last Jedi don’t contradict those that have gone before, in fact the whole approach to the Force as a naturalistic elemental power rather than one wielded exclusively by those born to be Jedi (“the vanity of the Jedi to think it belonged to them”) is one of the great successes of The Last Jedi.

I’m fine with introducing new powers as long as these powers are used in a consistent manner in the same movie, and don’t cause inconsistencies in previously released films, that weren’t there before, or can be reasonably explained in-universe.

I suspect you will reply to this as you seem determined to have the last word, but for me you are the type of Star Wars fan that nitpicks the fantasy to death - and sadly it appears you have killed the enjoyment of it for yourself.

The Force powers introduced in the ST are fine by me, but it makes no sense for Snoke to be able to link the minds of Rey and Kylo, allow them to read each other’s minds, see each other and touch each other, and then claim Snoke can’t read Rey’s mind. This is nonsense.

If Snoke can do all these amazing things with the Force from a trillion miles away, including allowing Kylo to read Rey’s mind, and vice versa, he can read Rey’s mind himself, period. The fact that he doesn’t do this to find her and Luke’s location is inconsistent and contrived. It’s that simple. I will still enjoy the movie, as I have, but it’s a movie with flaws, and this is one of the big ones.

I’m pretty sure he reads her mind, doesn’t he? He even talks about dealing with Skywalker after they kill the rebels. Or are you talking about how he should have read her mind while she was still on the island?

Yes, exactly. Snoke wants to find and destroy Luke Skywalker. To do this he enacts an elaborate scheme to connect Rey and Kylo’s minds, to convince Rey that if she comes to Kylo, he will turn back to the light side. However, this is a ruse, because Snoke wants Rey to reveal Luke’s location. However, since he was able to allow Kylo and Rey to read each other’s minds, see and even touch each other (influence their visual cortex, and cerebrum), he should have been able to read Rey’s mind directly as he did in the throne room. He could thus have immediately discovered Luke’s location, while Rey was still on the island, and send Kylo and his troops to destroy both.

I don’t mean to seem like i am jumping in here, but i find myself wondering if they really can read each other’s minds when connected via the force. I don’t remember that ever happening? They saw each other’s 'future’when they touched hands… that is all i come up with.

Kylo could see who her parents are in her mind. He stated this in the film. He subsequently reveals the information in the throne room.

Author
Time

DrDre said:

Novus_Opiate said:

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

TavorX said:

Novus_Opiate said:
He says the temptation came over him but for a brief moment. He wasn’t going to actually do it.

Yeah I get that; what I don’t get is why it even came to that point to begin with? I mean we have to consider, it wasn’t simply a tempting thought, but those thoughts actually compelled Luke to pull out his lightsaber and ignite it! That’s so irrational of Luke. Sure, I bet killing Kylo is a thought would had crossed anyone’s mind if they learned Kylo’s taint of the darkside, but this is Luke here. I’d buy Luke was outside of Kylo’s hut, stewing back and forth of what to do and how to confront him; however again, it’s beyond me to think this temptation compelled Luke to pull out his lightsaber and stop himself from committing the murder at the last second.

dahmage said:
Luke’s final version and what is generally accepted as the true version has Luke go in to read kylo Ren’s mind. After seeing kylo rens darkness he has what he describes as a very brief moment of thinking that it would be better to kill him. And without thinking ignited his lightsaber and immediately, immediately regretted that decision.
No, again, it makes no sense. Luke in ROTJ was struggling between whether to kill Vader or redeem him, and yes, it came to that point where he was tempted to really finish Vader off, but he came to senses to not fall for the bait. So all these years later, that lesson he learned was for nothing…?

I don’t get all these complaints that boil down to “Luke would never do that” (including disappearing in the first place) when we basically saw nothing that happened between the end of ROTJ and TFA/TLJ. People change, especially those that have suffered trauma. It’s the same complaint about Han that makes no sense either.

Sorry, but in movies you don’t change people’s characters off-screen unless it’s logical. Luke growing wiser and more confident between TESB and ROTJ is logical. Luke going from believing in his Nazi father to contemplating his nephews murder is not. Such a change of character needs to be explained more thoroughly. Given that so many don’t buy the way Luke behaves, I think it’s clear this part of the plot is underdeveloped.

I think his rash behavior in the OT and the fact that what he saw in Ben’s mind was traumatic would cause him to make the mistake of briefly “acting on instinct”. Doesn’t seem out of the realm of possibility.

I’m not saying it’s out of the realm of possibility. I’m saying it could have been developed better. Luke doesn’t just have the idea float around in his mind, he activates his lightsaber and contemplates killing a sleeping boy who hasn’t yet committed any crimes.

sorry, but “contemplates killing” is your own wording, and it is clear that you are over-inflating the problems in your descriptions of parts of the film because you didn’t like it. it wasn’t contemplation, it was an instinctual reaction that lasted a split second.

Author
Time

dahmage said:

also, wasn’t the point of connecting their minds, to trick Rey into coming to him? finding luke from Rey was just a part 2 of the plan, not the whole plan. Rey was someone to be dealt with on her own based on her force use in TFA, snoke knew this.

Yeah, but why trick Rey to come to him, if he can send an armada to come to them, and get both Rey and Luke?

Author
Time

The props in movie didn’t look quite right to me – they looked cheap. I remember thinking during the movie that I would expect to see such props on a Disney ride! This includes the silly fish Luke spears, a number of the robots, and the alien creatures, all of which looked about as good as those dinosaurs on that 1990s show about dinosaur people that Jim Henson did.

Author
Time

DrDre said:

dahmage said:

also, wasn’t the point of connecting their minds, to trick Rey into coming to him? finding luke from Rey was just a part 2 of the plan, not the whole plan. Rey was someone to be dealt with on her own based on her force use in TFA, snoke knew this.

Yeah, but why trick Rey to come to him, if he can send an armada to come to them, and get both Rey and Luke?

this is again your thinking though. no evidence that he knows where they are!

Author
Time

DrDre said:

dahmage said:

DrDre said:

Collipso said:

DrDre said:

Matt.F said:

Dre, you’re trying to say that Snoke not being able to read Rey’s mind whilst she’s on Jedi Island is a plothole?!

You’re frustratingly inconsistent. One minute you’re arguing a case that Force users need to be geographically near each other to telepathically commune. The next you’re saying that Poe having his mind read during interrogation by Kylo isn’t canon, and only Force Users can read other Force Users minds - even when you’ve been shown to be wrong about that.

No, I’m very consistent. I’m stating:

  1. In the OT the Force users originally (at least up till 1983) needed to be geographically near each other to telepathically commune.

  2. There’s no evidence in the OT itself, that Force users can read non-Force users minds. This has to be inferred from EU material and movies released after the OT.

  3. The Jedi mind probe is a retcon, that was subsequently prominently featured in TFA. I have no problem with this.

  4. The ST changes the rules by allowing Force users to telepathically commune over much larger distances. I have no problem with this either.

  5. That TLJ applies the ST rules inconsistently. This is a problem for me.

The truth is you’ve devised some personal ‘rule system’ for how force powers work, it ignores actual canon and makes sense to no one but yourself, but you cant seem to grasp that.

I don’t ignore canon, but I also don’t ignore how these powers were first introduced to the audience, starting in 1977.

The truth is we are shown new Force powers on pretty much a movie by movie basis. If you’re going to be adamant and say that only the Force powers you saw in ANH in 1977 are valid and all the rest are bogus then you’re going to be disappointed by every new Star Wars movie that comes out, because I guarantee the Force will evolve in every episode because audiences thrive on ‘the new’. The force powers shown in The Last Jedi don’t contradict those that have gone before, in fact the whole approach to the Force as a naturalistic elemental power rather than one wielded exclusively by those born to be Jedi (“the vanity of the Jedi to think it belonged to them”) is one of the great successes of The Last Jedi.

I’m fine with introducing new powers as long as these powers are used in a consistent manner in the same movie, and don’t cause inconsistencies in previously released films, that weren’t there before, or can be reasonably explained in-universe.

I suspect you will reply to this as you seem determined to have the last word, but for me you are the type of Star Wars fan that nitpicks the fantasy to death - and sadly it appears you have killed the enjoyment of it for yourself.

The Force powers introduced in the ST are fine by me, but it makes no sense for Snoke to be able to link the minds of Rey and Kylo, allow them to read each other’s minds, see each other and touch each other, and then claim Snoke can’t read Rey’s mind. This is nonsense.

If Snoke can do all these amazing things with the Force from a trillion miles away, including allowing Kylo to read Rey’s mind, and vice versa, he can read Rey’s mind himself, period. The fact that he doesn’t do this to find her and Luke’s location is inconsistent and contrived. It’s that simple. I will still enjoy the movie, as I have, but it’s a movie with flaws, and this is one of the big ones.

I’m pretty sure he reads her mind, doesn’t he? He even talks about dealing with Skywalker after they kill the rebels. Or are you talking about how he should have read her mind while she was still on the island?

Yes, exactly. Snoke wants to find and destroy Luke Skywalker. To do this he enacts an elaborate scheme to connect Rey and Kylo’s minds, to convince Rey that if she comes to Kylo, he will turn back to the light side. However, this is a ruse, because Snoke wants Rey to reveal Luke’s location. However, since he was able to allow Kylo and Rey to read each other’s minds, see and even touch each other (influence their visual cortex, and cerebrum), he should have been able to read Rey’s mind directly as he did in the throne room. He could thus have immediately discovered Luke’s location, while Rey was still on the island, and send Kylo and his troops to destroy both.

I don’t mean to seem like i am jumping in here, but i find myself wondering if they really can read each other’s minds when connected via the force. I don’t remember that ever happening? They saw each other’s 'future’when they touched hands… that is all i come up with.

Kylo could see who her parents are in her mind. He stated this in the film. He subsequently reveals the information in the throne room.

my memory isn’t perfect, but wasn’t this during the hand touching?

Author
Time

dahmage said:

DrDre said:

Novus_Opiate said:

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

TavorX said:

Novus_Opiate said:
He says the temptation came over him but for a brief moment. He wasn’t going to actually do it.

Yeah I get that; what I don’t get is why it even came to that point to begin with? I mean we have to consider, it wasn’t simply a tempting thought, but those thoughts actually compelled Luke to pull out his lightsaber and ignite it! That’s so irrational of Luke. Sure, I bet killing Kylo is a thought would had crossed anyone’s mind if they learned Kylo’s taint of the darkside, but this is Luke here. I’d buy Luke was outside of Kylo’s hut, stewing back and forth of what to do and how to confront him; however again, it’s beyond me to think this temptation compelled Luke to pull out his lightsaber and stop himself from committing the murder at the last second.

dahmage said:
Luke’s final version and what is generally accepted as the true version has Luke go in to read kylo Ren’s mind. After seeing kylo rens darkness he has what he describes as a very brief moment of thinking that it would be better to kill him. And without thinking ignited his lightsaber and immediately, immediately regretted that decision.
No, again, it makes no sense. Luke in ROTJ was struggling between whether to kill Vader or redeem him, and yes, it came to that point where he was tempted to really finish Vader off, but he came to senses to not fall for the bait. So all these years later, that lesson he learned was for nothing…?

I don’t get all these complaints that boil down to “Luke would never do that” (including disappearing in the first place) when we basically saw nothing that happened between the end of ROTJ and TFA/TLJ. People change, especially those that have suffered trauma. It’s the same complaint about Han that makes no sense either.

Sorry, but in movies you don’t change people’s characters off-screen unless it’s logical. Luke growing wiser and more confident between TESB and ROTJ is logical. Luke going from believing in his Nazi father to contemplating his nephews murder is not. Such a change of character needs to be explained more thoroughly. Given that so many don’t buy the way Luke behaves, I think it’s clear this part of the plot is underdeveloped.

I think his rash behavior in the OT and the fact that what he saw in Ben’s mind was traumatic would cause him to make the mistake of briefly “acting on instinct”. Doesn’t seem out of the realm of possibility.

I’m not saying it’s out of the realm of possibility. I’m saying it could have been developed better. Luke doesn’t just have the idea float around in his mind, he activates his lightsaber and contemplates killing a sleeping boy who hasn’t yet committed any crimes.

sorry, but “contemplates killing” is your own wording, and it is clear that you are over-inflating the problems in your descriptions of parts of the film because you didn’t like it. it wasn’t contemplation, it was an instinctual reaction that lasted a split second.

You’re talking semantics. He instinctively thought about killing a sleeping boy, his nephew, who hasn’t yet committed any crimes for a split second. The Luke we knew didn’t show those instincts.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

dahmage said:

DrDre said:

dahmage said:

also, wasn’t the point of connecting their minds, to trick Rey into coming to him? finding luke from Rey was just a part 2 of the plan, not the whole plan. Rey was someone to be dealt with on her own based on her force use in TFA, snoke knew this.

Yeah, but why trick Rey to come to him, if he can send an armada to come to them, and get both Rey and Luke?

this is again your thinking though. no evidence that he knows where they are!

No, but he should know. He can link their minds, get Kylo to read Rey’s mind to see hidden memories of her parents, get them to see each other, and touch each other, so he should be able to read her mind and get the information about their location. If he can make Rey and Kylo touch each other, he should be able to touch her himself, and choke the life out of her.

I don’t know, maybe he just likes to screw with their minds.

Author
Time

DrDre said:

dahmage said:

DrDre said:

Novus_Opiate said:

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

TavorX said:

Novus_Opiate said:
He says the temptation came over him but for a brief moment. He wasn’t going to actually do it.

Yeah I get that; what I don’t get is why it even came to that point to begin with? I mean we have to consider, it wasn’t simply a tempting thought, but those thoughts actually compelled Luke to pull out his lightsaber and ignite it! That’s so irrational of Luke. Sure, I bet killing Kylo is a thought would had crossed anyone’s mind if they learned Kylo’s taint of the darkside, but this is Luke here. I’d buy Luke was outside of Kylo’s hut, stewing back and forth of what to do and how to confront him; however again, it’s beyond me to think this temptation compelled Luke to pull out his lightsaber and stop himself from committing the murder at the last second.

dahmage said:
Luke’s final version and what is generally accepted as the true version has Luke go in to read kylo Ren’s mind. After seeing kylo rens darkness he has what he describes as a very brief moment of thinking that it would be better to kill him. And without thinking ignited his lightsaber and immediately, immediately regretted that decision.
No, again, it makes no sense. Luke in ROTJ was struggling between whether to kill Vader or redeem him, and yes, it came to that point where he was tempted to really finish Vader off, but he came to senses to not fall for the bait. So all these years later, that lesson he learned was for nothing…?

I don’t get all these complaints that boil down to “Luke would never do that” (including disappearing in the first place) when we basically saw nothing that happened between the end of ROTJ and TFA/TLJ. People change, especially those that have suffered trauma. It’s the same complaint about Han that makes no sense either.

Sorry, but in movies you don’t change people’s characters off-screen unless it’s logical. Luke growing wiser and more confident between TESB and ROTJ is logical. Luke going from believing in his Nazi father to contemplating his nephews murder is not. Such a change of character needs to be explained more thoroughly. Given that so many don’t buy the way Luke behaves, I think it’s clear this part of the plot is underdeveloped.

I think his rash behavior in the OT and the fact that what he saw in Ben’s mind was traumatic would cause him to make the mistake of briefly “acting on instinct”. Doesn’t seem out of the realm of possibility.

I’m not saying it’s out of the realm of possibility. I’m saying it could have been developed better. Luke doesn’t just have the idea float around in his mind, he activates his lightsaber and contemplates killing a sleeping boy who hasn’t yet committed any crimes.

sorry, but “contemplates killing” is your own wording, and it is clear that you are over-inflating the problems in your descriptions of parts of the film because you didn’t like it. it wasn’t contemplation, it was an instinctual reaction that lasted a split second.

You’re talking semantics. He instinctively thought about killing a sleeping boy, his nephew, who hasn’t yet committed any crimes for a split second. The Luke we knew didn’t show those instincts.

I suppose. I really don’t want to make this feel like i am arguing with you, because you don’t deserve that, but i feel like the things you took from this film are just so different than what i see.

I feel like the film already answered your point. Luke was dead tired of being viewed as the perfect legend. the movie was very explicit about that. and as many other people have shared already, the film really worked this angle in lots of ways. Just think about it, your view of who and what luke is, is exactly what drove him to exile himself in the film. It is a terrible burden to have people think that you are incapable of having human flaws. I LOVED that.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

dahmage said:

DrDre said:

dahmage said:

DrDre said:

Novus_Opiate said:

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

TavorX said:

Novus_Opiate said:
He says the temptation came over him but for a brief moment. He wasn’t going to actually do it.

Yeah I get that; what I don’t get is why it even came to that point to begin with? I mean we have to consider, it wasn’t simply a tempting thought, but those thoughts actually compelled Luke to pull out his lightsaber and ignite it! That’s so irrational of Luke. Sure, I bet killing Kylo is a thought would had crossed anyone’s mind if they learned Kylo’s taint of the darkside, but this is Luke here. I’d buy Luke was outside of Kylo’s hut, stewing back and forth of what to do and how to confront him; however again, it’s beyond me to think this temptation compelled Luke to pull out his lightsaber and stop himself from committing the murder at the last second.

dahmage said:
Luke’s final version and what is generally accepted as the true version has Luke go in to read kylo Ren’s mind. After seeing kylo rens darkness he has what he describes as a very brief moment of thinking that it would be better to kill him. And without thinking ignited his lightsaber and immediately, immediately regretted that decision.
No, again, it makes no sense. Luke in ROTJ was struggling between whether to kill Vader or redeem him, and yes, it came to that point where he was tempted to really finish Vader off, but he came to senses to not fall for the bait. So all these years later, that lesson he learned was for nothing…?

I don’t get all these complaints that boil down to “Luke would never do that” (including disappearing in the first place) when we basically saw nothing that happened between the end of ROTJ and TFA/TLJ. People change, especially those that have suffered trauma. It’s the same complaint about Han that makes no sense either.

Sorry, but in movies you don’t change people’s characters off-screen unless it’s logical. Luke growing wiser and more confident between TESB and ROTJ is logical. Luke going from believing in his Nazi father to contemplating his nephews murder is not. Such a change of character needs to be explained more thoroughly. Given that so many don’t buy the way Luke behaves, I think it’s clear this part of the plot is underdeveloped.

I think his rash behavior in the OT and the fact that what he saw in Ben’s mind was traumatic would cause him to make the mistake of briefly “acting on instinct”. Doesn’t seem out of the realm of possibility.

I’m not saying it’s out of the realm of possibility. I’m saying it could have been developed better. Luke doesn’t just have the idea float around in his mind, he activates his lightsaber and contemplates killing a sleeping boy who hasn’t yet committed any crimes.

sorry, but “contemplates killing” is your own wording, and it is clear that you are over-inflating the problems in your descriptions of parts of the film because you didn’t like it. it wasn’t contemplation, it was an instinctual reaction that lasted a split second.

You’re talking semantics. He instinctively thought about killing a sleeping boy, his nephew, who hasn’t yet committed any crimes for a split second. The Luke we knew didn’t show those instincts.

I suppose. I really don’t want to make this feel like i am arguing with you, because you don’t deserve that, but i feel like the things you took from this film are just so different than what i see.

I feel like the film already answered your point. Luke was dead tired of being viewed as the perfect legend. the movie was very explicit about that. and as many other people have shared already, the film really worked this angle in lots of ways. Just think about it, your view of who and what luke is, is exactly what drove him to exile himself in the film. It is a terrible burden to have people think that you are incapable of having human flaws. I LOVED that.

It’s fine. I like these debates. We don’t allways have to agree. There’s no right and wrong position. I thought Mark Hamill gave a great performance, and mostly enjoyed the movie. There are great things in this film, but some things were glossed over too quickly in my view, or underdeveloped.

Author
Time

DrDre said:

dahmage said:

DrDre said:

Novus_Opiate said:

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

TavorX said:

Novus_Opiate said:
He says the temptation came over him but for a brief moment. He wasn’t going to actually do it.

Yeah I get that; what I don’t get is why it even came to that point to begin with? I mean we have to consider, it wasn’t simply a tempting thought, but those thoughts actually compelled Luke to pull out his lightsaber and ignite it! That’s so irrational of Luke. Sure, I bet killing Kylo is a thought would had crossed anyone’s mind if they learned Kylo’s taint of the darkside, but this is Luke here. I’d buy Luke was outside of Kylo’s hut, stewing back and forth of what to do and how to confront him; however again, it’s beyond me to think this temptation compelled Luke to pull out his lightsaber and stop himself from committing the murder at the last second.

dahmage said:
Luke’s final version and what is generally accepted as the true version has Luke go in to read kylo Ren’s mind. After seeing kylo rens darkness he has what he describes as a very brief moment of thinking that it would be better to kill him. And without thinking ignited his lightsaber and immediately, immediately regretted that decision.
No, again, it makes no sense. Luke in ROTJ was struggling between whether to kill Vader or redeem him, and yes, it came to that point where he was tempted to really finish Vader off, but he came to senses to not fall for the bait. So all these years later, that lesson he learned was for nothing…?

I don’t get all these complaints that boil down to “Luke would never do that” (including disappearing in the first place) when we basically saw nothing that happened between the end of ROTJ and TFA/TLJ. People change, especially those that have suffered trauma. It’s the same complaint about Han that makes no sense either.

Sorry, but in movies you don’t change people’s characters off-screen unless it’s logical. Luke growing wiser and more confident between TESB and ROTJ is logical. Luke going from believing in his Nazi father to contemplating his nephews murder is not. Such a change of character needs to be explained more thoroughly. Given that so many don’t buy the way Luke behaves, I think it’s clear this part of the plot is underdeveloped.

I think his rash behavior in the OT and the fact that what he saw in Ben’s mind was traumatic would cause him to make the mistake of briefly “acting on instinct”. Doesn’t seem out of the realm of possibility.

I’m not saying it’s out of the realm of possibility. I’m saying it could have been developed better. Luke doesn’t just have the idea float around in his mind, he activates his lightsaber and contemplates killing a sleeping boy who hasn’t yet committed any crimes.

sorry, but “contemplates killing” is your own wording, and it is clear that you are over-inflating the problems in your descriptions of parts of the film because you didn’t like it. it wasn’t contemplation, it was an instinctual reaction that lasted a split second.

You’re talking semantics. He instinctively thought about killing a sleeping boy, his nephew, who hasn’t yet committed any crimes for a split second. The Luke we knew didn’t show those instincts.

I think this is the same Luke that has always looked forward or “looked to the horizons” instead of concentrating on what’s in front of him. Yoda called him out on it again. This is the same Luke that has not learned from his mistakes or teachings. If he was any different, I would have been upset.

When it came to Ben, Luke was scared sh*tless about what he would become. Because of this he made a fleeting decision that he literally backed away from a second later. Luke is not perfect and he’s not the savior of the universe. I felt this made his character more believable in the end. We all make mistakes and make rash decisions that affect our lives. Why should Luke be so different? And again, if hew was concentrating on where he was and what he was doing, he wouldn’t have looked forward, freaked out, and made such a costly mistake.

This is Luke and I loved it.

Author
Time

Yes, I took that moment and Luke’s narration I believed backed this up that he was instinctively raising his lightsaber against the dark side - the terrible darkness - rather than against Ben Solo. Saying he was going to murder his young nephew is rather literal - it was what he glimpsed ‘within’ Ben that he instinctively thought to strike down.

Author
Time

Collipso said:

Honestly I think Hamill puts it in a much better way than any of us could.

https://youtu.be/hpu8pD9C-1s

Did you read through the comments in that video? Seems like every comment they are hating what Disney has done to Star Wars and hate what they did with Luke Skywalker. Even read some comments saying they think the prequels are better than the new Star Wars Disney movies.

I really think in 5-10 years you will see the level of hate of these Disney Star Wars movies like what happened with the prequels.

Author
Time

Ryan said:

Collipso said:

Honestly I think Hamill puts it in a much better way than any of us could.

https://youtu.be/hpu8pD9C-1s

Did you read through the comments in that video? Seems like every comment they are hating what Disney has done to Star Wars and hate what they did with Luke Skywalker. Even read some comments saying they think the prequels are better than the new Star Wars Disney movies.

I really think in 5-10 years you will see the level of hate of these Disney Star Wars movies like what happened with the prequels.

are you suggesting we take youtube comments as representative of the world at large? LOL

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Ryan said:

Collipso said:

Honestly I think Hamill puts it in a much better way than any of us could.

https://youtu.be/hpu8pD9C-1s

Did you read through the comments in that video? Seems like every comment they are hating what Disney has done to Star Wars and hate what they did with Luke Skywalker. Even read some comments saying they think the prequels are better than the new Star Wars Disney movies.

I really think in 5-10 years you will see the level of hate of these Disney Star Wars movies like what happened with the prequels.

Internet commenters (especially Yahoo & YouTube) are the dregs of society right now. YouTube is part of my job (I help brands) and it doesn’t matter what type of content is put out, people will find a reason to crap all over it.

I feel the opposite for the ST. I think people will grow to like it even more. I disliked TPM after the crawl and I never recovered from it. I even got to see it in advance as my parents’ neighbor worked for Kenner. I was 21 at the time.

TFA and TLJ did not come close to this for me and it’s all because I truly care about the characters and not just Luke/Han/Leia. I understand this is all personal and subjective, but I don’t see these movies ever reaching prequel levels of hatred.

Author
Time

dahmage said:

Ryan said:

Collipso said:

Honestly I think Hamill puts it in a much better way than any of us could.

https://youtu.be/hpu8pD9C-1s

Did you read through the comments in that video? Seems like every comment they are hating what Disney has done to Star Wars and hate what they did with Luke Skywalker. Even read some comments saying they think the prequels are better than the new Star Wars Disney movies.

I really think in 5-10 years you will see the level of hate of these Disney Star Wars movies like what happened with the prequels.

are you suggesting we take youtube comments as representative of the world at large? LOL

Not at all. But I was expecting to see a mix of hate/love type thing like we see on here. But it was 100% hate on the new Star Wars and what Disney did with Luke Skywalker.

Also, there are a lot of channels on Youtube who have commentary on Star Wars over the years. And I can remember many many of them talking about how they originally loved the prequels, but years later realized that they were really crap. And then those same commentators now are all loving the new Star Wars movies. And I just think years down the road, history will repeat and they’ll say they originally liked the new Star Wars but now (future) realize they are crap.

I’ve got some channels on Youtube to check out who flipped on liking and later hating the prequels. And I’ll check out their TLJ review and check out the comments section to see where people are.

Author
Time

Last night before falling asleep I ran this through my mind: could we witness some kind of retconning in future SW movies (episodes)? What do you guys think?

Author
Time

This is what luke said when explaining to rey what happened with Ben:

“I saw darkness. I’d sensed it building in him. I’d seen it in moments during his training. But then i looked inside. And it was beyond what i ever imagined ( then you hear lightsabers and screaming). Snoke had already turned his heart. He would bring destruction and pain and death and the end of everything that i loved because of what he would become. And in the briefest moment of pure instinct i thought i could stop it. It passed like a fleeting shadow. And i was left with shame. And with consequence. And the last thing i saw were the eyes of a frightened boy who’s master had failed him.”

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time

Just briefly rewatching TFA’s intro and it really highlights the difference in humor used. While the humor is vastly different from the OT, I think it still works well, though I cannot exactly nail down the exact reason but I’ll try. So in TFA, Poe is brought to Kylo Ren and Poe says that “Who talks first, I talk first, you talk first?” but Kylo doesn’t really play along with it. He keeps his composure and serious demeanor all the way through until he’s frustrated with Poe’s last line of, “It’s hard to understand you with that apparatus” and sends him off to the transport. Maybe it’s similar to Han in ANH where Han is having that intercom chit-chat with that Imperial officer. It plays out funny because we know Han is trying to convince and sell the fact everything is fine right after clearing that room, but of course that officer picks up on the fact that something is off. In either case, each gag works because one side is goofing off a bit, but the other side is completely serious.

So come TLJ’s opening gag bit between Hux and Poe, it falls flat to me because it’s as if both parties are pretty much in on the gag. It’s completely over-the-top to me that Hux goes along with it and keeps asking, "Can he really hear me?"
I don’t know, maybe I’m saying complete non-sense here, but it’s just a thought that hit me when I just loaded up TFA again and noticing how different it feels. The serious moments are able to linger and consistently maintain the tone. Then once the tension is gone, then the humor when it comes is more appropriate.

I wonder if someone can better explain this.

The Rise of Failures

Author
Time

nmr1723 said:

Ryan said:

Collipso said:

Honestly I think Hamill puts it in a much better way than any of us could.

https://youtu.be/hpu8pD9C-1s

Did you read through the comments in that video? Seems like every comment they are hating what Disney has done to Star Wars and hate what they did with Luke Skywalker. Even read some comments saying they think the prequels are better than the new Star Wars Disney movies.

I really think in 5-10 years you will see the level of hate of these Disney Star Wars movies like what happened with the prequels.

Internet commenters (especially Yahoo & YouTube) are the dregs of society right now. YouTube is part of my job (I help brands) and it doesn’t matter what type of content is put out, people will find a reason to crap all over it.

I feel the opposite for the ST. I think people will grow to like it even more. I disliked TPM after the crawl and I never recovered from it. I even got to see it in advance as my parents’ neighbor worked for Kenner. I was 21 at the time.

TFA and TLJ did not come close to this for me and it’s all because I truly care about the characters and not just Luke/Han/Leia. I understand this is all personal and subjective, but I don’t see these movies ever reaching prequel levels of hatred.

The new stuff may not get to prequel level hate later on. But we’ll find out in the future. The one advantage of the new movies is they have a lot better CGI than the prequels. So the prequels CGI looks really dated and I know one complaint people have on the prequels is the dated CGI and the crappy “green screen” backgrounds that weren’t done that well compared to today. Though the new Star Wars has some crappy CGI like Maz Kanata and that meat ball monster thing chasing Han Solo.

I still think it would have been better this new trilogy to not have the original main characters in it. I didn’t like the idea at first as Carry didn’t look good or seem like she could act good now, and she didn’t. But I warmed up to it expecting a badass Luke Skywalker kicking ass, but we really didn’t get any of that.

I’ve watched TPM probably 10+ times and I still don’t know what that movie is about.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Saw it yesterday morning.  Mixed thoughts. To me, the inconsistent tone of serious\silly made it feel as though they had the contents of two films forced together.  At two and a half hours, a few more minutes of story for each and they could have easily come up with separate movies. The Finn\Rose\Casino story could be one film, a lighter film. The Luke\Rey\Ben story could be another, a more serious film.

What I liked:
I liked and wanted to see more Luke\Rey.  I dug that they didn’t get along.  He’s not the mythological hero everyone made him out to be (fans or in-universe).  He’s a realistic hero instead. His messages and guidance to her were exactly the kind of cerebral depth for which I was hoping.  I particularly liked when he told her that the Jedi don’t have rights & powers over the force - “that’s vanity”.  Awesome depth and brutal honesty on his part.  He’s warning her that just because she’s gifted and honest, she’s wrong to think that gives her an advantage. She can very easily fail, he’s experienced a lifetime of it.

LOVED seeing Hamill again and I think he’s by far the best part of the film.  Lots of good stuff and he steals the scenes.  His appearance on Crait near the end - worth the price of admission. In fact, to me the entire Crait portion of the film is exactly the kind of universe expansion I like. That felt far, far, away. His brush-off gesture after the insane firing barrage is a bit of our old ”great kid, don’t get cocky” hero. Speaking of which, some people have been criticizing his not being who he was expected to be (Kenobi II). To me, that’s what makes him interesting. I’m not at all who I was 40 years ago and I don’t expect Luke to be either. I would have been disappointed with Kenobi II.

I liked that Carrie had a big role in the film and I thought she did a great job. It was bittersweet for sure. Along those lines, there is a shot of her on Crait where she’s looking out over the vast nothingness, collar pulled up, that for me has as much weight as Luke looking out at the twin suns 40 years ago. She’s been driven into hiding on a remote planet with very nearly nothing left of the Resistance. You see the mental exhaustion on her face.

It’s a fantastic shot of her that also captures the journey some of us have also been on in real life for those 40 years. The fact that we lost her only a few months later really drives home the point; the journey takes its toll. I knew I would be moved seeing her again and knowing she’s gone. I didn’t expect them to give me a long shot that so perfectly captured it.

What I didn’t like:
The humor and silliness, almost all of which was the Finn\Rose\Casino portion. They’re fine actors, both and I have no problem with a lot of their scenes. I thought Rose’s best scene was her first with Finn; You’re the famous Resistance fighter, Finn. It’s an honor to actually meet you…oh, you’re stealing an escape shuttle to desert us? – zap!.. I’ll drag you down the hallway half-paralyzed, you traitor. The character of Rose could have easily worked being used in a more serious role. Perhaps we’ll get that in IX. I can see myself becoming a fan of Ms Tran in the right role.

The entire Canto Bight portion of the film seemed weirdly out of place. Their reason for going there was a huge stretch, the ship waiting for them to get back, the look of the place, the silliness of the characters, the drunken gambler putting coins in BB-8, their escape on Falkor and the Luckdragons, , etc., etc. – it all played like a Lucas-written prequel.

Some of that out of place comedy extended into other scenes in the Finn\Rose arc. When all hell is breaking loose later, Rose rides up on an AT-ST yelling “need a ride?” In a real battle she’d be screaming her lungs out for him to get in and laying down some return fire, not tossing out a silly\cool line. Her handling of the situation on Crait to stop him committing suicide is much more how I would like to see her character. BB-8 shooting slot machine tokens was total Lucas. They’re turning him into a flying R2 cartoon.

Also very Lucas-like was the scene with Finn walking down the hallway in a bacta suit, with it squirting everywhere. That is slapstick humor right out of a Will & Grace episode. https://media.giphy.com/media/26n79ollK7ocn2eCQ/giphy.gif Funny on Will & Grace, weirdly out of place in this film, or so I thought. The fact that it happens so early in the film was unfortunate (for me) because I saw what we may have been in for tone-wise. Sadly, I was correct.

There were other bits of comedic moments I found weirdly placed but the only one that come to mind at the moment is the milking scene. It seems almost as though it was put in for shock value or weird value. Those animals, as well as the caretakers would have been more interesting if they were just background characters. The rock falling down the hill and taking out the cart the two caretakers were pushing was, to me, tension-ruining and stupid. That all looked very 1980s Jim Henson Labyrinth.

What you may be surprised I liked:
Yoda. I thought the entire scene with Yoda was perfect. He worked in-story and the puppet work and cinematography was awesome. He looked the way I remembered him decades ago, he was serious, and – thankfully – much the same way Rogue One restored the mystery of the Force, this film restored the way in which Yoda speaks. Lucas went bananas with Yoda speaking every line backwards. Thank you Rian for correcting that and restoring the gravitas and dignity of Yoda as a character.

Porgs. I was fully prepared to dislike them. Instead, I found them to be an interesting nuisance. I live rurally so I know first-hand how some wild animals behave when given a chance. Birds, raccoons, frogs, possums, chickens, foxes, deer, etc. – they have no qualms what so ever about making themselves at home on my property, on my porch, sometimes in my garage, and even inside my house a few times. I usually welcome it because they were there first. Plus I’m a big animal lover. For that reason, I got a chuckle out of how many Porgs ended up inside the Falcon. Leave the door open long enough and animals will investigate and inhabit if it suits them. I found the Porgs to be spot-on with how a native species sometimes behaves.

Chewie. As has been the case for 40 years, Chewie has long been a favorite of mine. I’ve never had any issues with how he’s portrayed and this film is no different. Huge fan. Had my Chewie socks out and ready to wear the day before I went. Next purchase; the Chewie\Porg socks. https://www.stance.com/chewie-pal/M545D17CHW.html?dwvar_M545D17CHW_size=GREY&dwvar_M545D17CHW_color=GREY

What doesn’t move me one way or another:
Kylo. Somewhat interesting in a scene or two, but much like Vader when I was a kid, I just don’t find him interesting as a character. That is not a reflection on Driver. Much better this time around, but still not interesting.

Poe. Great performance by Oscar (both films), but under-used to the point of just being a hot-shot fly boy who yells “let’s get these guys” a lot. That said, I thought his communication goof on Hux was funny. An interesting way to get the character to show disrespect and buy time simultaneously. That scene of humor worked for me.

Rey. No, that’s not a typo. 😃 Loved her in the first half of Force Awakens and the first half of this film. However, now she’s just a sort of perfect character\Jedi with no depth. I’m very happy she’s Rey random, but that’s about it at this point. As with Rose and her silliness, maybe IX will fix Rey and her awesomeness.

Final thoughts:
I won’t go see this again in the theaters but I’ll buy a digital copy on iTunes next year and watch the Luke parts from time to time. My personal Star Wars canon will always be Star Wars77 and Rogue One. That said, I’m still very happy the franchise is in capable hands even though The Saga portion doesn’t speak to me.

I like that they cleaned house of Snoke and Phasma and did so quickly and without drama. They were just noise in an already very crowded story (both films).

I hope the next film picks up about 10 years down the road when the characters have some reason for us to care. I don’t mean that in a disrespectful or mean way, but in an honest way. Right now they’re all sort of one-dimensional. Addendums if I think of any.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

nmr1723 said:

DrDre said:

dahmage said:

DrDre said:

Novus_Opiate said:

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

TavorX said:

Novus_Opiate said:
He says the temptation came over him but for a brief moment. He wasn’t going to actually do it.

Yeah I get that; what I don’t get is why it even came to that point to begin with? I mean we have to consider, it wasn’t simply a tempting thought, but those thoughts actually compelled Luke to pull out his lightsaber and ignite it! That’s so irrational of Luke. Sure, I bet killing Kylo is a thought would had crossed anyone’s mind if they learned Kylo’s taint of the darkside, but this is Luke here. I’d buy Luke was outside of Kylo’s hut, stewing back and forth of what to do and how to confront him; however again, it’s beyond me to think this temptation compelled Luke to pull out his lightsaber and stop himself from committing the murder at the last second.

dahmage said:
Luke’s final version and what is generally accepted as the true version has Luke go in to read kylo Ren’s mind. After seeing kylo rens darkness he has what he describes as a very brief moment of thinking that it would be better to kill him. And without thinking ignited his lightsaber and immediately, immediately regretted that decision.
No, again, it makes no sense. Luke in ROTJ was struggling between whether to kill Vader or redeem him, and yes, it came to that point where he was tempted to really finish Vader off, but he came to senses to not fall for the bait. So all these years later, that lesson he learned was for nothing…?

I don’t get all these complaints that boil down to “Luke would never do that” (including disappearing in the first place) when we basically saw nothing that happened between the end of ROTJ and TFA/TLJ. People change, especially those that have suffered trauma. It’s the same complaint about Han that makes no sense either.

Sorry, but in movies you don’t change people’s characters off-screen unless it’s logical. Luke growing wiser and more confident between TESB and ROTJ is logical. Luke going from believing in his Nazi father to contemplating his nephews murder is not. Such a change of character needs to be explained more thoroughly. Given that so many don’t buy the way Luke behaves, I think it’s clear this part of the plot is underdeveloped.

I think his rash behavior in the OT and the fact that what he saw in Ben’s mind was traumatic would cause him to make the mistake of briefly “acting on instinct”. Doesn’t seem out of the realm of possibility.

I’m not saying it’s out of the realm of possibility. I’m saying it could have been developed better. Luke doesn’t just have the idea float around in his mind, he activates his lightsaber and contemplates killing a sleeping boy who hasn’t yet committed any crimes.

sorry, but “contemplates killing” is your own wording, and it is clear that you are over-inflating the problems in your descriptions of parts of the film because you didn’t like it. it wasn’t contemplation, it was an instinctual reaction that lasted a split second.

You’re talking semantics. He instinctively thought about killing a sleeping boy, his nephew, who hasn’t yet committed any crimes for a split second. The Luke we knew didn’t show those instincts.

I think this is the same Luke that has always looked forward or “looked to the horizons” instead of concentrating on what’s in front of him. Yoda called him out on it again. This is the same Luke that has not learned from his mistakes or teachings. If he was any different, I would have been upset.

I think the point of ROTJ was, that Luke was different, and had learned from his mistakes and teachings. He had also grown beyond his teachers, by seeing the good in Vader when his teachers could not.

Now part of that growth is reversed to make him more human and flawed. That brings new things to the table, but also alters the perspective on the character. Not everyone has to be on board for this. The Luke we meet in TLJ is very different from the one we left in ROTJ. It’s up to each of us to decide if TLJ sufficiently fills the gap, and if they like the moody and fearful Luke, who abandoned his friends and the universe.

When it came to Ben, Luke was scared sh*tless about what he would become. Because of this he made a fleeting decision that he literally backed away from a second later. Luke is not perfect and he’s not the savior of the universe. I felt this made his character more believable in the end. We all make mistakes and make rash decisions that affect our lives. Why should Luke be so different? And again, if hew was concentrating on where he was and what he was doing, he wouldn’t have looked forward, freaked out, and made such a costly mistake.

This is Luke and I loved it.

Like I said it is a different version of Luke as envisioned by RJ. It’s a more complex version, which is interesting, but I can’t blame anyone for missing the optimistic hero of the OT.

Author
Time

On opening night Thursday, when I watched TLJ, there was a screw up in my theater. As when it started, there was a loud voice over commentator. i.e. the voice thing for blind people to explain what’s happening on the screen. The voice over didn’t read the crawl but talked about the crawl going up the screen.

Anyways, with the loud voice thing, I wasn’t able to read the crawl. It was like trying to read the crawl with a really loud voice talking about things. Luckily they cut that off after like 5 minutes going into the movie.

I plan on watching it again in like a week or so.

Also I was real lucky getting a good seat. I got there 30 minutes early and there already was a huge line inside. They said they had 80% of the tickets already sold and had cut it off. So when I got in the theater, I thought all of the seats in the middle and upper section were taken. But there was one open seat halfway up right in the middle. I kept seeing a bunch of people coming in pissed off not being to get a seat in the middle and upper sections.

I was thinking I was going to have to sit in the bottom section right in front of the screen. I’ve got stuck before in a packed theater and had to sit right in front of the screen. Really sucks as you have to tilt your head all the way back to look up at the screen. And it looks all weird and stretched because you are sitting too close.