Ok, I said I was going to give up, but I’ve decided to inform you of a few details you missed since you refused to watch the video.
the guy giving the orders on the video of the shooting is not the same guy that actually fired the shots. The guy giving the orders was the sergeant of the guy that fired the shots.
They had no idea if there was or was not a third person in the room that had not yet come out.
long rifle(the witness that called the cops thought they had a long rifle) rounds can penetrate and go through walls like those found in hotels.
Okay, thank you, I didn’t see this comment a minute ago. I got some of this because I read the guy’s comments, but apparently for some reason that’s no substitute for watching an hour-long video. I think the first point just shows that both officers are guilty. The second seems week to me because that shouldn’t have any bearing on whether they execute the surrendering man. As for the rifle, how does executing the surrendering suspect prevent a guy with a long rifle from shooting them? Like I said, it’s incompetence at best, murder at worst. That “good cop” in the video should find either of those to be huge problems. It’s the good cops that make excuses for these bad ones, always, and that needs to stop.